
aaronjb wrote:
Well..
yes.
.
![]()
my fragile male ego couldn't take it
Plus I wouldn't want to leave a stain..
Adrenalin is brown, you know..


I'm not even gona comment on the stain.













Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
aaronjb wrote:
Well..
yes.
.
![]()
my fragile male ego couldn't take it
Plus I wouldn't want to leave a stain..
Adrenalin is brown, you know..
jont wrote:Andhere
you can see a master of the art and watch his footwork
![]()
![]()
![]()
=D>
What was jonb saying about driving gods?
Paul White wrote:do it all the time..
.
for about 6
-7 years now
jont wrote:Andhere
you can see a master of the art and watch his footwork
![]()
![]()
![]()
=D>
What was jonb saying about driving gods?
jimi wrote:![]()
Could some one explain to me how using this technique can possibly be kinder to your clutch than using the normal gear change method
?
The most wear on a clutch is bound to occur when its partially engaged/dis-engaged
(ie slipping
) using this technique the clutch is going to spend more time slipping than normal
= more wear
not less, or am I missing something
![]()
jimi wrote:So your not using the clutch at all? Because if your depressing the clutch then at some stage it has to be slipping
(wearing).
ENSMR2 wrote:So how should it"feel" then when done correctly?? Like I said before? No lurch forwards or sudden slowing etc?
I really need for it to be described so I know what I am"feeling" for.
Lauren wrote:A bit too much really doesn't matter, though with practice you can get it spot on most of the time.