Anyone any recommendatins and why? Its for a car that essentialy will be used on the track with the odd few weeked drives
cheers
scott
[Mk2] [Turbo] Motec M4 or M400??
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
-
scotiamr2t
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 6:52 pm
- Location: Falkirk
- Contact:
[Mk2] [Turbo] Motec M4 or M400??
Im changing up from my Apexi Power FC as it got water damaged and is not repairable so trying to decide whether to go M4 or M400!
Anyone any recommendatins and why? Its for a car that essentialy will be used on the track with the odd few weeked drives
cheers
scott
Anyone any recommendatins and why? Its for a car that essentialy will be used on the track with the odd few weeked drives
cheers
scott
Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Motec M4 or M400??
M4 is old
'02 VX220 2.2 n/a Daily driver - Exige Size TD 1.2 - TAT shorty Diffuser - HardTop - Chris Tullet 4-1 Manifold.'97 mk1 Mazda Eunos Turbo track car with 260bhp/ton - soon more as Chris Wilsons going to build me an engine over the winter 
) .Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Motec M4 or M400??
I have used both M4 and m400 on race cars and the biggest difference is the PC mapping software and data logging tools (the m400 being the more modern and useable).
The m400 has better onboard traction control software and a couple of additional obscure features. But if you just want to drive it and don't want to fiddle with the mapping or don't want to pay for the data logging then you would struggle to tell the difference from the seat.
The m400 has better onboard traction control software and a couple of additional obscure features. But if you just want to drive it and don't want to fiddle with the mapping or don't want to pay for the data logging then you would struggle to tell the difference from the seat.