max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Discussion and technical advice for 84-89 AW10 & AW11 MR2. 3A-LU, 4A-GE, 4A-GZE.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

Post Reply
bobbyh
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:14 am
Location: manchester

max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by bobbyh »

o.k. so hypothetically when i've got the money, what increases have people got over the stock 124b.h.p.

if you do the whole breathing/exhaust/high-lift cam/magnecor leads etc,
what would that take us up too?

loving the little car so far, but can see a day when another 20..30..40 odd horses might be nice!
SuperRedMR2
Posts: 5494
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Wickford, Essex

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by SuperRedMR2 »

I looked into doing the whole camshaft things but its just too expensive really. Might as well get an engine conversion.

Ive an mongoose exhaust, blitz air filter and magnecor leads, with an engine nearing 100k I would hope I had 124bhp
un1eash
Posts: 4453
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 8:25 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by un1eash »

Stock is 122bhp, with a 100k+ engine i agree with above and you'd be lucky to get 122 with an induction kit and exhaust. Mine made 121bhp with a leaky janspeed and k&n.

The 4age is already highly tuned and you can spend alot of money on cams, head work standalone or piggy back ecu and only see 140-145bhp.
un1eash
Posts: 4453
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 8:25 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by un1eash »

It may be worthing reading this also....

http://www.billzilla.org/4agmods.htm
bobbyh
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:14 am
Location: manchester

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by bobbyh »

it's a 89 mk1b, that'll be the other type of engine!?
t-bar89
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by t-bar89 »

bobbyh wrote:o.k. so hypothetically when i've got the money, what increases have people got over the stock 124b.h.p.

if you do the whole breathing/exhaust/high-lift cam/magnecor leads etc,
what would that take us up too?

loving the little car so far, but can see a day when another 20..30..40 odd horses might be nice!


I reckon 140bhp at a push... Not really worth the money or effort IMHO.

A mk1 supercharger is around 150bhp standard and able to gain 30bhp for less than £200 with the big pulley kit mod. Trust me... this is plenty fast enough then.

:thumleft:
bobbyh
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:14 am
Location: manchester

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by bobbyh »

aren't the superchargers all auto 'boxes?

and they are rare as anyway.
cartledge_uk
Posts: 7608
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 6:28 pm
Location: Newbury

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by cartledge_uk »

bobbyh wrote:aren't the superchargers all auto 'boxes?

and they are rare as anyway.


No.

And there are more than you think couple for sale every month at the moment

bobbyh wrote:it's a 89 mk1b, that'll be the other type of engine!?


What do you mean? I think you are confused. 122bhp std, that link is realistic.
Jim-SR
Posts: 841
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:14 pm
Location: Basingstoke
Contact:

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by Jim-SR »

to answer the thread title, the maximum horspower ever acheived normally aspirated with a 4A-GE is over 300bhp, currently in use on several SCCA Formula Atlantic cars in the USA

the most power you could possibly make in an MR2 normally aspirated though depends on what is the most powerful engine you can transplant in. tuning the 4A-GE past 220bhp is impractical on a road car, tuning it past 160bhp is incredibly wasteful financially

to get a 4A-GE to 160bhp youll need cams, vernier cam gears, headwork (ideally, you can probably get away without it but youll have to go bigger on cams to compensate and youll lose power at lower revs), a solid engine to start with (if its got ANY problems then youll lose power and have reliability issues later), a piggyback ECU, slightly larger exhaust, and probably a few other small changes to accomodate the extra power. that lot would stand you in at somewhere around the £1000-1800 mark, depending on how much stuff you source 2nd hand

to get a 4A-GE to 200bhp you need cams, cam gears, headwork, throttle bodies, standalone engine management, forged pistons, forged h-beam rods, lightened and balanced bottom end, lightweight flywheel, a full engine rebuild to fit in all the new parts, uprated valve springs, underbucket followers, thinner head gasket, exhaust manifold, exhaust, bigger injectors, underdrive auxillary pulleys, etc, etc. pricing is then widely varied depending on whether you do the work yourself. if you do the work yourself then £3500-6000 depending on the parts used

to get it done professionally then its a £6000-8000 engine build!!! however professionally you could get to 220-230bhp without needing to upgrade many other parts, youd just need it rebuilt a bit more often

the sensible option if you want lots more power is to transplant in a more powerful engine. the options then are...

4A-GE 20-valve (160-165bhp, throttle bodies as standard so it sounds pretty awesome, and a fairly easy swap, it bolts straight in, just some wiring to do and youre away!)

4A-GZE (supercharged, but similar characteristics to an NA engine, fits straight in, again just wiring)

3S-GE (normally aspirated and 200bhp is very possible, needs engine mounts welding in, wiring, and a fair few other modifications)

3S-GTE (upto 240bhp straight out of the box, and 300bhp isnt too tricky, similar to 3S-GE in terms of fitting it)

2ZZ-GE (190bhp normally aspirated as standard, VVTi so its got torque as well, and can be tuned to 220bhp or so without massive effort. physically fits in more easily than the 3S engines, but the wiring and plumbing is the really difficult part)

then youve got the variety of V6 and V8 Toyota options, or if youre insane you can venture away from Toyota engines completely and do something else mad. budget and imagination are the only limiting factors
bobbyh
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:14 am
Location: manchester

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by bobbyh »

thanks for the detailed replies..

think i need to do more homework on engine codes.

the mk1a and mk1b had different engine codes? AW11?

but i think the 20v route sounds simplest for me. what would you pay for a 2nd hand lump?

ta
jimi
Posts: 2154
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:27 am
Location: Kingdom of Fife
Contact:

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by jimi »

bobbyh wrote:
think i need to do more homework on engine codes.

the mk1a and mk1b had different engine codes? AW11?



AW11 isn't the engine code.

A = Engine Family (A series engine, 4 cylinder, petrol )
W = platform code (MR2)
11= Model code (the original MK1 was a AW10 [JDM only], the next variation is ours (AW11)
1a & 1b aren't official Toyota designations, 1b's are just a facelift variation.

The engine code is 4A-GE
4= The revision number
A = Engine family (A series)
G = Twin cam (DOHC) sports type head (wide angle, 45 degrees or more between the intake and exhaust valves)
E = Electronic Fuel Injection

Jimi
Edit
This site will give you loads of info on Mr T's engines CLICKY
BarronMR
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 10:00 pm
Location: Brighouse, West Yorkshire.

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by BarronMR »

bobbyh wrote:thanks for the detailed replies..

but i think the 20v route sounds simplest for me. what would you pay for a 2nd hand lump?

ta


I see this might be fun. In my opinion if your sticking na, the engine thats the most beneficial would be the 3vz-fe (3.0 ltr v6) 8-[

If your swapping engines may aswell go for the most grunt that will fit without major work.

They are easily obtainable for £500 or less and gearbox's can be had for £50.
bobbyh
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:14 am
Location: manchester

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by bobbyh »

cheers again, but im still a little confused..

mine has a distributor, so the E-for electronic fuel injection, must ONLY refer to the fuel delivery side, and not the spark/ignition?

the VR6 (prev car) had a coil-pack instead of a dizzy.

cheers. im technically minded, but not a mechanic..
bobbyh
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:14 am
Location: manchester

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by bobbyh »

with regard to the BarronMR,

i wouldn't want to go down the V6 route, cos by addeing significantly greater mass, you would compromise the balance which is why i love the car..
sure it'd be a hell of a laugh still!!
jimi
Posts: 2154
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:27 am
Location: Kingdom of Fife
Contact:

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by jimi »

bobbyh wrote:cheers again, but im still a little confused..

mine has a distributor, so the E-for electronic fuel injection, must ONLY refer to the fuel delivery side, and not the spark/ignition?

the VR6 (prev car) had a coil-pack instead of a dizzy.

cheers. im technically minded, but not a mechanic..


The EFI (Electronic Fuel Injection), ESA ( Electronic Spark Advance) and Diagnosis systems are all controlled the ECU.
The distributor sends position info to the ECU and puts the sparks to the correct cylinder, but the ECU does the controlling.
Jimi
bobbyh
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:14 am
Location: manchester

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by bobbyh »

copied from wikipeadia-

[edit] Mechanical vs Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI)
The term Mechanical when applied to fuel injection is used to indicate that metering functions of the fuel injection -how the correct amount of fuel for any given situation is determined and delivered- is not achieved electronically but rather through mechanical means alone. All the components in both 'mechanical' or Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI) systems that deliver the fuel in to the engine -the pumps, plumbing, valves, injectors- are mechanical in operation. The difference being that in EFI systems the injectors are switched on and off electronically by the EFI control electronics. This ability to control the injectors electronically allows far more variation in when and how the fuel is injected.
un1eash
Posts: 4453
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 8:25 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by un1eash »

You'll be surprised how little the weight difference is between the 4AGE, 3S-GTE, 3VZ-FE.

I hope to go the 3S-GTE route one day.
BarronMR
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 10:00 pm
Location: Brighouse, West Yorkshire.

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by BarronMR »

bobbyh wrote:with regard to the BarronMR,

i wouldn't want to go down the V6 route, cos by addeing significantly greater mass, you would compromise the balance which is why i love the car...


As said by unleach, weight isn't an issue as its such low change of mass, that it doesn't affect the handling. And you can always go for the lighter alloy 1mz v6, but it will cost a little more.

To give an example, its like the difference between a mk2 n/a and mk2 turbo.
JMR_AW11
Posts: 1408
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:56 pm

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by JMR_AW11 »

bobbyh wrote:cheers again, but im still a little confused..

mine has a distributor, so the E-for electronic fuel injection, must ONLY refer to the fuel delivery side, and not the spark/ignition?

the VR6 (prev car) had a coil-pack instead of a dizzy.

cheers. im technically minded, but not a mechanic..


A few years ago I took a mk1 MR2 ECU apart and reverse engineered the mapping etc.

The ECU controls both the fuel and the ignition and I wrote a few pages explaining how the fuelling and timing was determind by the ECU.


eg see the link below for the ignition timing. The article is quite old and needs editing/updating but it gives a pretty good idea of how it functions.

http://www.jmrhzu.btinternet.co.uk/mk1_ECU/part3p1.html
Paff
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:38 pm

Re: max b.h.p. without forced induction?

Post by Paff »

As said above, the weight of the V6 engine makes little if any real difference to the cars charachteristics. In fact I prefer the way my V6 handles to my stripped out standard car.
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK1 1984-1989 NA & SC”