

http://snurl.com/2erup
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Goto10 wrote:They clearly needed the highest performance possible, therefore out of all the consoles available they opted to use Cell CPUs, as found in the PS3.
matt_mr2t wrote:
Fact is though, 13,000 processors being fast isnt exactly a testiment to the PS3 being great.
H3RB wrote:when the ps2 was first launched a nasa scientist said that it was that power full that if u had 10,000 of them linked together u could power a shuttle on launch..
.
.
i couldnt help but think
"so would 10,000,000
sega mega drives.
.
.
matt_mr2t wrote:
Fact is though, 13,000 processors being fast isnt exactly a testiment to the PS3 being great.
One day, I might buy a game for mine.
Tiny wrote:GH3, GT5, MGS series not a good enough reason then?
Admittedly the blue ray is one of the only reasons i managed to get her to say yes![]()
H3RB wrote:when the ps2 was first launched a nasa scientist said that it was that power full that if u had 10,000 of them linked together u could power a shuttle on launch..
.
.
i couldnt help but think
"so would 10,000,000
sega mega drives.
.
.
Goto10 wrote:H3RB wrote:when the ps2 was first launched a nasa scientist said that it was that power full that if u had 10,000 of them linked together u could power a shuttle on launch..
.
.
i couldnt help but think
"so would 10,000,000
sega mega drives.
.
.
Or 90'000'000 360 CPUs
Doesn't change the fact they chose the superior CPU:p
matt_mr2t wrote:Part of me thinks"sell it and buy a standalone bluray player" but then I keep thinking
"eventually something is gonna make owning it worth while"
It's been nearly 5 months now though![]()
Built from 13,000 of the Cell processors first used in the PlayStation 3 console, teamed up with nearly7,000 AMD processors
designed for desktop computers,