
I take it all back!!

LOL

It seems I am losing my mind!
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Mk1Supercharger SE Steve wrote:My dad had the best mk1 as totally original i have ever seen but he sold it last year, it went up to Scotland and haven't heard much about it since![]()
It really was a stunner! everything as it should have been, no respray!
It came second at the 2004 meet that was the 20th anniversary for the mr2's, even though my dads car had not had a respray throughout it's lifetime, as the winner had, my dad lost because he didn't have a Toyota battery.
Now how can that be right!!!
jrleech wrote:Mk1Supercharger SE Steve wrote:My dad had the best mk1 as totally original i have ever seen but he sold it last year, it went up to Scotland and haven't heard much about it since![]()
It really was a stunner! everything as it should have been, no respray!
It came second at the 2004 meet that was the 20th anniversary for the mr2's, even though my dads car had not had a respray throughout it's lifetime, as the winner had, my dad lost because he didn't have a Toyota battery.
Now how can that be right!!!
If you had two identical cars, one completely original, the other restored, and they were both of the same standard/condition/finish, I'd give the prize to the restored one.![]()
It takes a lot more effort to restore a car to
'new condition' than it does to just store a minter in you garage, and effort should be rewarded.
.
.
.
.
IMHO
kevin..in wrote:jrleech wrote:Mk1Supercharger SE Steve wrote:My dad had the best mk1 as totally original i have ever seen but he sold it last year, it went up to Scotland and haven't heard much about it since![]()
It really was a stunner! everything as it should have been, no respray!
It came second at the 2004 meet that was the 20th anniversary for the mr2's, even though my dads car had not had a respray throughout it's lifetime, as the winner had, my dad lost because he didn't have a Toyota battery.
Now how can that be right!!!
If you had two identical cars, one completely original, the other restored, and they were both of the same standard/condition/finish, I'd give the prize to the restored one.![]()
It takes a lot more effort to restore a car to
'new condition' than it does to just store a minter in you garage, and effort should be rewarded.
.
.
.
.
IMHO
think I would disagree here Jon its hard to keep a car in perfect original condition, money can buy you almost anything
originality can never be reproduced
original and restored are two different things and should be judged as such
SySanguinary wrote:Howdy folks.The car in question is now my Father's(Barrie Taylor).
![]()
.
Mk1Supercharger SE Steve wrote:I saw the car at JAE and was well suprised it didn't win best mk1 on the stand![]()
Mk1Supercharger SE Steve wrote:I agree with the wheels, i don't think that they look right on the car, i think it needs tidy mk1a's back on it, all that effort into getting the car back to original, without the proper wheels seems a bit of a waste of time to me, eveyone to their own but i prefer the 1a's to b's.