





Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Draven wrote:Draven wrote:EdMR2 wrote:ok i'll leave it for now.Lets see if it dies off, i bet someone will continue bitching.
I just think its funny how this thread would have been locked if it was concerning any other person, this can been seen all over this forum.
Ed.
Well lets consider that the end of it.
Please anyone else considering to post in this thread.Could you please think to yourself before your actually posting as to what it will achieve.
.
If you have any doubts in your mind please
DO NOT POST..
![]()
This is going around and around and to be quite honest i'm peed off about it..
.
So END OF..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
![]()
enigma wrote:So is edmr2 and ed the same person? Which is probably tim anyway.From now on should be known as TIM-ED.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
luthor1 wrote:The idea of an open post is that people can post their thoughts and feelings to it.
I for one will be making a pertinent comment everytime someone says"shut up".
There is NO difference between saying
"shut up" and
"locking the thread".
You are just FORCING people to LOCK THE THREAD THEMSELVES by shutting up by choice, which we do not have to do.
This is getting offensive, the way IMOC, and certian members are trying to control an open current thread.
IMOC- use the lock button if you want to.
MEMBERS- discuss this topic as much as you want whilst staying on topic.
At present we are being held to ransom by EDMR2 who insist he will post until everyone shuts up, we have non official members saying"shut up" and the IMOC committee and mods will not lock it.
Lock it, or accept it will, on occassion, be posted to, and frankly stop whining that it's still going, it's an interesting topic.If all the moaning and whining about it not being locked was removed it would be a short and very relevant thread.
As it is, lock it, or stop moaning that people are posting to it.
Ed wrote:enigma wrote:So is edmr2 and ed the same person? Which is probably tim anyway.From now on should be known as TIM-ED.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Shows how dumb you are.![]()
![]()
Check the join date.
![]()
![]()
I've been around longer than either Tim or Edmr2 you noob.
EarL wrote:Tiamat wrote:Can we put this to rest again please?
Why does nobody listen?When even an ex comitee member requests this, isn't it about time you all took notice, instead of raking over old coals?
Tims gone.![]()
Let it rest ffs.
![]()
![]()
CosmosblueMR2 wrote:Draven wrote:
Who the hell are your refering to when you say"non official" and what does that mean in the first place
?
he means YOU, you plum![]()
![]()
![]()
as youused
to be a Moderator.
EDIT- Plum in this case is not meant as defamatory or insulting
- more a term of endearment
![]()
Dale_V wrote:I know what its like being on the imoc team, poncing around trying to make a decision so then everyones happy![]()
![]()
, but come on someone get a spine and lock the
'kin thing!
Tiamat wrote:Dale_V wrote:I know what its like being on the imoc team, poncing around trying to make a decision so then everyones happy![]()
![]()
, but come on someone get a spine and lock the
'kin thing!
ITs a Committee decision as the thread was started to explain what had been agreed between the Committee and Tim Bill and to provide a thread whereby the matter could be discussed by the members without it spilling into alternative threads.![]()
![]()
In my opinion until this thread dies properly it should be kept open but ALL MEMBERS SHOULD CONSIDER WHETHER IT IS TRULY NECESSARY TO POST ON THE THREAD NOW and locked after it is clearly finished.
If not, then it is a decision for the Committee to take.
Dale_V wrote:
dear lord, this has gone beyond stupid!
EarL wrote:Tiamat wrote:Can we put this to rest again please?
Why does nobody listen?When even an ex comitee member requests this, isn't it about time you all took notice, instead of raking over old coals?
Tims gone.![]()
Let it rest ffs.
![]()
![]()
Draven wrote:I have tried to keep myself out of this
jmachling wrote:EarL wrote:Tiamat wrote:Can we put this to rest again please?
Why does nobody listen?When even an ex comitee member requests this, isn't it about time you all took notice, instead of raking over old coals?
Tims gone.![]()
Let it rest ffs.
![]()
![]()
I'm not so sure he has, and I don't think I'm alone in that speculation.
Yes, it's my first post on this and yes, it could be seen as raking over old coals, but there's one old and quite important coal that as a paid up premium member I'd like to see flipped over in public view.
I want to know the full and unedited details of the correspondence sent to IMOC committee members that led them to believe that there was a serious chance of legal action taking place.![]()
Serious enough to have to restructure certain aspects of the club meaning that my
(admittedly meagre)
£5 is now not being wholly spent on what it should be spent on
- i.e.
the direct benefit of the members.
Until that point, my feeling is that this thread should be left open and this point should be repeated as many times as is necessary until ALL the facts are presented.
I just find it really sad that one person can have such a fundamental and detrimental effect on the running of IMOC.![]()
I hope that as a result of the restructuring this is much less likely to be possible in the future.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
to the mods and committee
(both present incumbents and recently resigned) for having to deal with this entirely unecessary xxxx storm.
jmachling wrote:Thanks for the very clear response.![]()
I guess I hadn't fully appreciated that it wasn't just Tim that didn't want the details published.
nailmonkey wrote:@ Draven,
Why is it up to you to decide when people should stop posting? You haven't posted a single useful thing in this thread, so maybe you're not in the best position to decide if there are any more valid points or questions to be raised.
FYI I stopped posting in here a while ago, until people started the'group buy witch-hunt list', this is not the correct way to deal with the situation IMO, so I had to post.
![]()
I also stopped posting yesterday, until you kept it going by ordering everyone to stop posting.
Both times, do you know how I stopped posting? I simply*stopped replying*.
![]()
I'm going to do it again! Now! So you can have the last word, as I'm sure you will have to, and I promise not to post unless something
new and relevant to the topic
comes up.
Nik
Draven wrote:I have tried to keep myself out of this![]()
Should have tried harder![]()
jmachling wrote:Thanks for the very clear response.![]()
I guess I hadn't fully appreciated that it wasn't just Tim that didn't want the details published.