Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

What's happening at the Club. You can post your suggestions and ideas here, along with reports of any problems using the site.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

Post Reply
enigma
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:20 pm

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by enigma »

So is edmr2 and ed the same person? Which is probably tim anyway. From now on should be known as TIM-ED. :roll: :roll:
Draven
Posts: 14968
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:34 am
Location: One of the Hamptons.
Contact:

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Draven »

Draven wrote:
Draven wrote:
EdMR2 wrote:ok i'll leave it for now. Lets see if it dies off, i bet someone will continue bitching.

I just think its funny how this thread would have been locked if it was concerning any other person, this can been seen all over this forum.

Ed.


Well lets consider that the end of it.


Please anyone else considering to post in this thread. Could you please think to yourself before your actually posting as to what it will achieve.. If you have any doubts in your mind please

DO NOT POST..

This is going around and around and to be quite honest i'm peed off about it...


So END OF.....



........ :evil:


Can we shut up now please.
luthor1
Posts: 2452
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 7:03 pm
Location: Southampton

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by luthor1 »

The idea of an open post is that people can post their thoughts and feelings to it.

I for one will be making a pertinent comment everytime someone says "shut up". There is NO difference between saying "shut up" and "locking the thread".

You are just FORCING people to LOCK THE THREAD THEMSELVES by shutting up by choice, which we do not have to do.

This is getting offensive, the way IMOC, and certian members are trying to control an open current thread.

IMOC - use the lock button if you want to.
MEMBERS - discuss this topic as much as you want whilst staying on topic.

At present we are being held to ransom by EDMR2 who insist he will post until everyone shuts up, we have non official members saying "shut up" and the IMOC committee and mods will not lock it.

Lock it, or accept it will, on occassion, be posted to, and frankly stop whining that it's still going, it's an interesting topic. If all the moaning and whining about it not being locked was removed it would be a short and very relevant thread.

As it is, lock it, or stop moaning that people are posting to it.
Ed
Posts: 1268
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 11:54 am
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Ed »

enigma wrote:So is edmr2 and ed the same person? Which is probably tim anyway. From now on should be known as TIM-ED. :roll: :roll:


Shows how dumb you are. Check the join date. I've been around longer than either Tim or Edmr2 you noob.
Draven
Posts: 14968
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:34 am
Location: One of the Hamptons.
Contact:

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Draven »

luthor1 wrote:The idea of an open post is that people can post their thoughts and feelings to it.

I for one will be making a pertinent comment everytime someone says "shut up". There is NO difference between saying "shut up" and "locking the thread".

You are just FORCING people to LOCK THE THREAD THEMSELVES by shutting up by choice, which we do not have to do.

This is getting offensive, the way IMOC, and certian members are trying to control an open current thread.

IMOC - use the lock button if you want to.
MEMBERS - discuss this topic as much as you want whilst staying on topic.

At present we are being held to ransom by EDMR2 who insist he will post until everyone shuts up, we have non official members saying "shut up" and the IMOC committee and mods will not lock it.

Lock it, or accept it will, on occassion, be posted to, and frankly stop whining that it's still going, it's an interesting topic. If all the moaning and whining about it not being locked was removed it would be a short and very relevant thread.

As it is, lock it, or stop moaning that people are posting to it.


I'm sensing you just prefer arguing the same point over and over.. I personally don't see why. I was making an attempt to calm the situation down as this is only damaging the clubs reputation.

"we have non official members saying "shut up" and the IMOC committee and mods will not lock it."

Who the hell are your refering to when you say "non official" and what does that mean in the first place ?

I for one am fed up with all the bickering. Its such a waste of time. People are arguing a point that has long since died..

I can't be assed with this anymore.. You guys can continue to post complaining about TIM and ED.. your not going to achieve anything.

So i'll stop moaning.. and you continue moaning about it.
luthor1
Posts: 2452
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 7:03 pm
Location: Southampton

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by luthor1 »

Draven - well done, you've just made YOUR OWN CHOICE without telling other people what to do. What a step forward. Now if only others would make their OWN choices.

I'll sweep my own side of the street and leave others to do theirs.
Tiamat
IMOC Moderator
Posts: 10179
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Hailsham, East Sussex

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Tiamat »

Ed wrote:
enigma wrote:So is edmr2 and ed the same person? Which is probably tim anyway. From now on should be known as TIM-ED. :roll: :roll:


Shows how dumb you are. Check the join date. I've been around longer than either Tim or Edmr2 you noob.


I have met Ed and can confirm he is not EDMR2.
I am going to live forever, or die trying!
Dale_V
Posts: 7979
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Dale_V »

if no info regarding the correspondence between time and the commitee is going to be released to the IMOC public, then lock the xxxxxx thread FFS :@ its going no where and has been the same old xxxx for 20+ pages ](*,) ](*,)
Dale_V
Posts: 7979
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Dale_V »

EarL wrote:
Tiamat wrote:Can we put this to rest again please?

Why does nobody listen? When even an ex comitee member requests this, isn't it about time you all took notice, instead of raking over old coals? :roll:

Tims gone. Let it rest ffs. :evil:


why dont you lock it then earl?

I know what its like being on the imoc team, poncing around trying to make a decision so then everyones happy :roll: , but come on someone get a spine and lock the xxxxxx thing!
Draven
Posts: 14968
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:34 am
Location: One of the Hamptons.
Contact:

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Draven »

CosmosblueMR2 wrote:
Draven wrote:
Who the hell are your refering to when you say "non official" and what does that mean in the first place ?



he means YOU, you plum #-o :eye:

as you used to be a Moderator.




EDIT - Plum in this case is not meant as defamatory or insulting - more a term of endearment :mrgreen:



But its like he means i'm not really a member of IMOC.... duh... :-# Just ignore me.. :pale:
Tiamat
IMOC Moderator
Posts: 10179
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Hailsham, East Sussex

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Tiamat »

Dale_V wrote:I know what its like being on the imoc team, poncing around trying to make a decision so then everyones happy :roll: , but come on someone get a spine and lock the 'kin thing!


ITs a Committee decision as the thread was started to explain what had been agreed between the Committee and Tim Bill and to provide a thread whereby the matter could be discussed by the members without it spilling into alternative threads.

In my opinion until this thread dies properly it should be kept open but ALL MEMBERS SHOULD CONSIDER WHETHER IT IS TRULY NECESSARY TO POST ON THE THREAD NOW and locked after it is clearly finished.

If not, then it is a decision for the Committee to take.
I am going to live forever, or die trying!
Dale_V
Posts: 7979
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Dale_V »

Tiamat wrote:
Dale_V wrote:I know what its like being on the imoc team, poncing around trying to make a decision so then everyones happy :roll: , but come on someone get a spine and lock the 'kin thing!


ITs a Committee decision as the thread was started to explain what had been agreed between the Committee and Tim Bill and to provide a thread whereby the matter could be discussed by the members without it spilling into alternative threads.

In my opinion until this thread dies properly it should be kept open but ALL MEMBERS SHOULD CONSIDER WHETHER IT IS TRULY NECESSARY TO POST ON THE THREAD NOW and locked after it is clearly finished.

If not, then it is a decision for the Committee to take.


dear lord, this has gone beyond stupid!
Tiamat
IMOC Moderator
Posts: 10179
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Hailsham, East Sussex

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Tiamat »

Dale_V wrote:
dear lord, this has gone beyond stupid!


Why? Because its a Committee decision? They started the thread, its their decision to end it. Not mine.
I am going to live forever, or die trying!
jmachling
Posts: 3949
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Where the cider apples grow.

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by jmachling »

EarL wrote:
Tiamat wrote:Can we put this to rest again please?

Why does nobody listen? When even an ex comitee member requests this, isn't it about time you all took notice, instead of raking over old coals? :roll:

Tims gone. Let it rest ffs. :evil:


I'm not so sure he has, and I don't think I'm alone in that speculation.

Yes, it's my first post on this and yes, it could be seen as raking over old coals, but there's one old and quite important coal that as a paid up premium member I'd like to see flipped over in public view.

I want to know the full and unedited details of the correspondence sent to IMOC committee members that led them to believe that there was a serious chance of legal action taking place. Serious enough to have to restructure certain aspects of the club meaning that my (admittedly meagre) £5 is now not being wholly spent on what it should be spent on - i.e. the direct benefit of the members.

Until that point, my feeling is that this thread should be left open and this point should be repeated as many times as is necessary until ALL the facts are presented.

I just find it really sad that one person can have such a fundamental and detrimental effect on the running of IMOC. I hope that as a result of the restructuring this is much less likely to be possible in the future.

:clap: :clap: :clap: to the mods and committee (both present incumbents and recently resigned) for having to deal with this entirely unecessary xxxx storm.
nailmonkey
Posts: 926
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:57 pm
Location: Stoke

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by nailmonkey »

@ Draven,

Why is it up to you to decide when people should stop posting? You haven't posted a single useful thing in this thread, so maybe you're not in the best position to decide if there are any more valid points or questions to be raised.

FYI I stopped posting in here a while ago, until people started the 'group buy witch-hunt list', this is not the correct way to deal with the situation IMO, so I had to post. I also stopped posting yesterday, until you kept it going by ordering everyone to stop posting.

Both times, do you know how I stopped posting? I simply *stopped replying*. I'm going to do it again! Now! So you can have the last word, as I'm sure you will have to, and I promise not to post unless something new and relevant to the topic comes up.

Nik

Draven wrote:I have tried to keep myself out of this


Should have tried harder :(
Tiamat
IMOC Moderator
Posts: 10179
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Hailsham, East Sussex

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Tiamat »

jmachling wrote:
EarL wrote:
Tiamat wrote:Can we put this to rest again please?

Why does nobody listen? When even an ex comitee member requests this, isn't it about time you all took notice, instead of raking over old coals? :roll:

Tims gone. Let it rest ffs. :evil:


I'm not so sure he has, and I don't think I'm alone in that speculation.

Yes, it's my first post on this and yes, it could be seen as raking over old coals, but there's one old and quite important coal that as a paid up premium member I'd like to see flipped over in public view.

I want to know the full and unedited details of the correspondence sent to IMOC committee members that led them to believe that there was a serious chance of legal action taking place. Serious enough to have to restructure certain aspects of the club meaning that my (admittedly meagre) £5 is now not being wholly spent on what it should be spent on - i.e. the direct benefit of the members.

Until that point, my feeling is that this thread should be left open and this point should be repeated as many times as is necessary until ALL the facts are presented.

I just find it really sad that one person can have such a fundamental and detrimental effect on the running of IMOC. I hope that as a result of the restructuring this is much less likely to be possible in the future.

:clap: :clap: :clap: to the mods and committee (both present incumbents and recently resigned) for having to deal with this entirely unecessary xxxx storm.


The correspondence is not going to be released I'm afraid as it involves the Committee members personally and Tim Bill personally. Whilst the end result does affect the club now, it does mean that in the future, anyone taking over in a Committee position should not be placed in a similar position. If it was not agreed to undertake such action then it was likely that the entire club would close. Due to the nature of the correspondence an agreement of all parties would be necessary to release the correspondence due to the nature of the priviledge, even if all the Committee bar one wanted it released, it would have to remain private due toits pirviledged nature. Plus as part of the agreement there was an implied condition that the correspondence would not be released.
I am going to live forever, or die trying!
jmachling
Posts: 3949
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Where the cider apples grow.

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by jmachling »

Thanks for the very clear response. I guess I hadn't fully appreciated that it wasn't just Tim that didn't want the details published.
Tiamat
IMOC Moderator
Posts: 10179
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Hailsham, East Sussex

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Tiamat »

jmachling wrote:Thanks for the very clear response. I guess I hadn't fully appreciated that it wasn't just Tim that didn't want the details published.


Not saying the Committee do not wish to have it published, just if even one member of the Committee at that time did not want it published then the others couldn't go ahead and do it.

Plus as said, part of the agreement includes an implied condition that the full details of the agreement would remain confidential. The Committee, though it may make life harder for them and cause them some "stick", are adhering to the agreement.
I am going to live forever, or die trying!
Draven
Posts: 14968
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:34 am
Location: One of the Hamptons.
Contact:

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Draven »

nailmonkey wrote:@ Draven,

Why is it up to you to decide when people should stop posting? You haven't posted a single useful thing in this thread, so maybe you're not in the best position to decide if there are any more valid points or questions to be raised.

FYI I stopped posting in here a while ago, until people started the 'group buy witch-hunt list', this is not the correct way to deal with the situation IMO, so I had to post. I also stopped posting yesterday, until you kept it going by ordering everyone to stop posting.

Both times, do you know how I stopped posting? I simply *stopped replying*. I'm going to do it again! Now! So you can have the last word, as I'm sure you will have to, and I promise not to post unless something new and relevant to the topic comes up.

Nik

Draven wrote:I have tried to keep myself out of this


Should have tried harder :(


the last word.. :D
Last edited by Draven on Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lauren
IMOC Committee
Posts: 38632
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: Tim Bill and IMOC-UK

Post by Lauren »

jmachling wrote:Thanks for the very clear response. I guess I hadn't fully appreciated that it wasn't just Tim that didn't want the details published.


I think you'll find that if it went to a vote the committee would unaminously want it posted. We have nothing to hide.
2020 GR Yaris - Circuit Pack :lover:
Post Reply

Return to “Club News and Announcements”