... I have got a Yaris
Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Re: Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
well after 6 pages mike2t has finally admited what he really drives....
... Re: Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
Yet again you are showing a complete lack of knowledge.. Tired now
. Tired now shibby! wrote:Mike_2t wrote:I am really chuffed you cant afford an Evo, you stick to your dated 15yr old MR2
You sure about that?
Dont assume mate! You just make an ass of yourself!
If i spent 15k on a car i would have a car that was actually faster and better than the mr2.
The evo looks like a spotty 17 year old threw up on it.
Evo is way down the list on cars to own!
15k, can think of cars MILES better than Evo.
It may be newer, but thats all it has going for it.
The youths driving it round my way, seem to think they have the best car around.
They have been educated!!!!
Nick
Re: Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
Im bored of these complete useless posts... they prove absolutely zero, quarter mile racing comes down the driver as well as horsepower, a 450hp EVO will be getting low 12's all day....
.. they prove absolutely zero, quarter mile racing comes down the driver as well as horsepower, a 450hp EVO will be getting low 12's all day....SW20Paul wrote:Im bored so i thought id join in,
Thought id share my experience with evo drivers last year i bumped into a guy i used to go to school with at york drag, Got chatting about cars and stuff I was in my rev1 tubby, asked him what car he was driving and he said evo 5 in the usual way like its the greatest car on earth and mines a peice of crap, I asked him what sort of mods he had done to his car he said it was running an Apexi PFC and 2bar of boostmaking 450hp
I thought wow maybe he's not like the rest of em and he's got the goods to back his mouth up.
Then he proceded to run these time's
13:45:08 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.263 2.290 9.068 77.790 14.070 99.280
15:09:50 RWYB CAR 0.00 0.864 2.278 9.003 4.840 13.986 99.090
15:19:16 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.365 2.566 9.879 4.430 15.081 94.310
15:35:30 RWYB CAR 0.00 2.799 2.352 9.242 4.770 14.210 99.630
15:40:28 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.028 2.624 10.027 4.420 15.183 97.440
15:51:09 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.033 2.067 8.922 4.960 13.928 99.290
16:02:20 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.103 2.212 9.254 4.780 14.297 99.150
Now just to show Im not like all evo drivers with a easily damadged ego here are my time slips.
12:01:05 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.226 2.454 9.361 78.320 14.373 97.380
13:03:34 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.229 2.449 9.446 78.440 14.447 97.970
13:44:44 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.176 2.381 9.318 77.920 14.369 96.760
13:52:19 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.042 2.221 9.045 78.990 14.083 999.999
YES there are quicker times than mine from the evo however i thought i would use this as an example of the ammount of crap people talk I mean 450hp and high 13's I think evo's must be made of lead.
Oh my old rev1 was stock apart from a blueflame exhaust cost me
Re: Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
Unsubscribing from the thread now as my inbox is getting clogged with urelevant/useless info.. See you soon guys, has been fun and reminded me why I moved on 
. See you soon guys, has been fun and reminded me why I moved on Re: Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
Mike_2t wrote:Im bored of these complete useless posts.
SW20Paul wrote:Im bored so i thought id join in,
Thought id share my experience with evo drivers last year i bumped into a guy i used to go to school with at york drag, Got chatting about cars and stuff I was in my rev1 tubby, asked him what car he was driving and he said evo 5 in the usual way like its the greatest car on earth and mines a peice of crap, I asked him what sort of mods he had done to his car he said it was running an Apexi PFC and 2bar of boost
I thought wow maybe he's not like the rest of em and he's got the goods to back his mouth up.
Then he proceded to run these time's
13:45:08 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.263 2.290 9.068 77.790 14.070 99.280
15:09:50 RWYB CAR 0.00 0.864 2.278 9.003 4.840 13.986 99.090
15:19:16 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.365 2.566 9.879 4.430 15.081 94.310
15:35:30 RWYB CAR 0.00 2.799 2.352 9.242 4.770 14.210 99.630
15:40:28 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.028 2.624 10.027 4.420 15.183 97.440
15:51:09 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.033 2.067 8.922 4.960 13.928 99.290
16:02:20 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.103 2.212 9.254 4.780 14.297 99.150
Now just to show Im not like all evo drivers with a easily damadged ego here are my time slips.
12:01:05 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.226 2.454 9.361 78.320 14.373 97.380
13:03:34 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.229 2.449 9.446 78.440 14.447 97.970
13:44:44 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.176 2.381 9.318 77.920 14.369 96.760
13:52:19 RWYB CAR 0.00 1.042 2.221 9.045 78.990 14.083 999.999
YES there are quicker times than mine from the evo however i thought i would use this as an example of the ammount of crap people talk I mean 450hp and high 13's I think evo's must be made of lead.
Oh my old rev1 was stock apart from a blueflame exhaust cost me
An MR2 with the same power would be running high 11's
Take it easy Mikey 2tits
MikeJC
-
zak_godsell
Re: Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
those times remind me of a certain evo last year.it was a evo 4 and the driver could not get into the 13,s.should they not be able to do low 13,s all day 
.the best my mate could do with a proven 470bhp was 12.9@115mph,he has a good excuse though as it has only been down the strip once and he is not used to it.his car now has 521bhp so it should go a bit better now.power at the wheel was about 300bhp if i remember right
.the best my mate could do with a proven 470bhp was 12.9@115mph,he has a good excuse though as it has only been down the strip once and he is not used to it.his car now has 521bhp so it should go a bit better now.power at the wheel was about 300bhp if i remember rightRe: Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
Just wondering what is the big difference between the scooby, evo and GT4 anyway? They're all the same and realisticly id rather spend on the GTR. IMO I think if u par a rev3 modded turbo it will be quicker in a str8 line than any 4WD pushing similar figures. On handling in the wet is a different story.
IMO I think if u par a rev3 modded turbo it will be quicker in a str8 line than any 4WD pushing similar figures. On handling in the wet is a different story.Watashi wa Ant desu, BAKA!!!
Re: Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
My point was just how much crap some people talk the terminal speeds of that evo do not equate to 450hp regardless of launch/driver skill 
my old car was a rev1, it was black, it will do 1/4 mile in just over 14s these are all facts.
It's no use saying evo's are great, Mines faster than yours ect,
Why not give us some hard fact's on how your evo if the greatest thing since nipples
the terminal speeds of that evo do not equate to 450hp regardless of launch/driver skill my old car was a rev1, it was black, it will do 1/4 mile in just over 14s these are all facts.It's no use saying evo's are great, Mines faster than yours ect,
Why not give us some hard fact's on how your evo if the greatest thing since nipples
Mike_2t wrote:Im bored of these complete useless posts.
Re: Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
Every car is different and its unfair to compare one against the other with all the mods available. With a perfect launch a standard evo is quicker than a standard rev 2 tubby (simple answer to your question).
When buying my last car my short list was a rev3,evo 6,skyline,gto,200sx,pulsar and a cossie...I choose the rev 3 tubby as after taking everything into consideration i thought that it had the most potential. I know that there are some highly modded evo`s out there running some superb times but there are some 2`s with just as good if not better. Iv`e seen some clips of 2`s in America running the quarter in a shade over 9 secs.....
I for one know i made the right choice 
tbh the tubby can kick ass with the right amount of money spent on it and with it`s good looks is the car of my choice. 
And head to head with a similar powered evo well i think the 2 will have it..
More areo dynamically and less drive-train loss...at the end of the day though who really cares...im happy
With a perfect launch a standard evo is quicker than a standard rev 2 tubby (simple answer to your question).When buying my last car my short list was a rev3,evo 6,skyline,gto,200sx,pulsar and a cossie.
..I choose the rev 3 tubby as after taking everything into consideration i thought that it had the most potential. I know that there are some highly modded evo`s out there running some superb times but there are some 2`s with just as good if not better. Iv`e seen some clips of 2`s in America running the quarter in a shade over 9 secs.....I for one know i made the right choice
tbh the tubby can kick ass with the right amount of money spent on it and with it`s good looks is the car of my choice.
And head to head with a similar powered evo well i think the 2 will have it.
.More areo dynamically and less drive-train loss.
..at the end of the day though who really cares...im happy Re: Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
Haven't read this whole thread, but going back onto the launch issue on 4WD Vs 2WD, i think if you check the 60ft times at TOTB last year and the year before, i am 99.9% sure the MR2 was the quickest. Quicker then 1000BHP Skylines / Norris Evo, etc etc!
Quicker then 1000BHP Skylines / Norris Evo, etc etc!M5
Re: Evo vs MR2 turbo Rev 2
...at the end of the day, even if the EGO were a quicker car (lol) would you want to drive a car that gets mistaken for a Bombay Texi? See you at TOTB, dipsh1t.
Sable Grey 2004 MkIII Roadster
Once an MR2 owner, ALWAYS an MR2 owner!
Once an MR2 owner, ALWAYS an MR2 owner!