
Kongaroo wrote:luthor1 wrote:lol Rikki!!
If you talk classic shape, then 300bhp scooby is quicer 0-60/0-100/1.4mile but not top speed.Reasons are traction, and gearing mainly, the scooby managing 100mph in 3rd quite easily, and onto 140mph in 4th it's no slouch at the top either.
The Scooby AWD system isn't as restrictive as you'd imagine, and don't forget the scoob and the MR2 weigh the same!!
Round a track the scoob has a much better chassis and would win there almost always bhp for bhp.
I have plumbed the numbers into CarTest and it predicts the Scoob to win.For those doubting thomas's, CarTest is obviously fictitious, and not
"real" however it's algorithms are at least consistent and the virtual driver changes gear at the same rate each time, and the tyres are of uniform grip.
(LOL
@ Rikki
- Evo!
![]()
![]()
)
Another good site is www.letstorquebhp.com which has a'calculator' for awd,rwd,fwd.
On this site there are a lot of theoretical values for lots of cars and is a great read![]()
![]()
Btw it lists the uk sti as 1470kg and www.subaru.co.uk lists the 2006 UK STi model as 1495kg so at equal bhp I would still expect the mr2 to catch the scooby by the 1/4 mile and have a definate advantage from 60-100 due to 150+kg lighter, much lower drag cd and less transmission loss.![]()
Although as you said the scoob would normally win the 0-60 dash.
I still don't see why the original post was so unbelievable- he is running 16psi which is 270-300 odd fwhp depending on the air/fuel ratio.
He also states 229bhp at the hubs so roughly 270bhp sounds about right?
Btw congrats on the good run rikki!


the guy at thor worked it out


229@hubs









WEIGHT i have no PAS, no ABS, no Aircon, no Airbags nothing,not even front foglights, except a radio with 2 speakers which i will be removing soon.


the car was a 3sfe originally so its pretty light in weight

it cant be much over 1250kg


is there anywhere that will weigh it????