is it a myth?

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

craigt1097
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Sheffield

is it a myth?

Post by craigt1097 »

Hello all. I'm new to the MR2 world. and what fun im having now im here.
Finally old enough to insure my first dream car, I have a question. I have an imported 94 MR2 N/A and was told because it is an imported it has 200bhp. is the right. I have driven a uk spec 92 MR2 and mine certainly feels faster. would be greatful if someone can let me know.
Driftlimits Performance
IMOC Affiliated Company
Posts: 4928
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:33 am
Location: 01442 601301
Contact:

Re: is it a myth?

Post by Driftlimits Performance »

Welcome mate! Glad you're enjoying yourself!

The fact that its and import doesn't mean that it has 200bhp I'm afraid.

The only NA to have 200bhp (nigh on) is the Beams VVTI MR2, which I think you'd know if you had it.

They do vary though, from 120bhp to 160bhp I think. and 200 for the beams. Although I'm a turbo head and not sure, an NA guy will come along soon enough!......
jimGTS
Posts: 14024
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: North Kent

Re: is it a myth?

Post by jimGTS »

craigt1097 wrote:Hello all. I'm new to the MR2 world. and what fun im having now im here.
Finally old enough to insure my first dream car, I have a question. I have an imported 94 MR2 N/A and was told because it is an imported it has 200bhp. is the right. I have driven a uk spec 92 MR2 and mine certainly feels faster. would be greatful if someone can let me know.


hi mate, welcome.

uk cars, 112bhp to 165bhp (rev 1/2 158bhp, rev3+ 165bhp (?)). they are the same bhp uk or import, it doesnt matter.
the 112bhp version has no spoiler (if that rings a bell with the 92 car you drove).
BEAMS mr2, VERY rare, 200bhp! alot more expensive to.

turbo, rev1/2 220bhp, rev3+ 245bhp!
User avatar
Lauren
IMOC Committee
Posts: 38632
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: is it a myth?

Post by Lauren »

Its actually 173bhp for Rev 3+ NAs.

3SFE camry engine is 119bhp
Rev 1,2 158bhp
jimGTS
Posts: 14024
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: North Kent

Re: is it a myth?

Post by jimGTS »

Lauren wrote:Its actually 173bhp for Rev 3+ NAs.

3SFE camry engine is 119bhp
Rev 1,2 158bhp


you sure they are over 170bhp??? didnt think they were.
nevamind. difference of 5BHP, perhaps your thinking of the mk2 on jap fuel!!
Rowland
Posts: 2016
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 8:36 am
Location: Leicestershire
Contact:

Re: is it a myth?

Post by Rowland »

jimGTS wrote:
you sure they are over 170bhp??? didnt think they were.
nevamind. difference of 5BHP, perhaps your thinking of the mk2 on jap fuel!!


Defo' 173 / 174 bhp on a N/A rev3+
IIRC post Aug 96 cars were detuned to 168 BHP due to emission laws I believe.

:D
ryan
Posts: 2628
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:09 pm
Location: Abergavenny,South Wales

Re: is it a myth?

Post by ryan »

Yes i'm pretty sure the last rev of the MR2 Mk2 was just over 170bhp, but they were slower and catted from 92 and 'lean burn' from '94 whatever that means. They got heavier with std p/s and other goodies as the years got on.
HTH
Ryan
jimGTS
Posts: 14024
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: North Kent

Re: is it a myth?

Post by jimGTS »

Rowland_W wrote:
jimGTS wrote:
you sure they are over 170bhp??? didnt think they were.
nevamind. difference of 5BHP, perhaps your thinking of the mk2 on jap fuel!!


Defo' 173 / 174 bhp on a N/A rev3+
IIRC post Aug 96 cars were detuned to 168 BHP due to emission laws I believe.

:D


AAAHHH, thats where i got that figure from then. so i was right in a way, lol!
User avatar
Lauren
IMOC Committee
Posts: 38632
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: is it a myth?

Post by Lauren »

jimGTS wrote:
Rowland_W wrote:
jimGTS wrote:
you sure they are over 170bhp??? didnt think they were.
nevamind. difference of 5BHP, perhaps your thinking of the mk2 on jap fuel!!


Defo' 173 / 174 bhp on a N/A rev3+
IIRC post Aug 96 cars were detuned to 168 BHP due to emission laws I believe.

:D


AAAHHH, thats where i got that figure from then. so i was right in a way, lol!


Yep. Right but wrong ;)
JohnnyC
Posts: 7001
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:25 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: is it a myth?

Post by JohnnyC »

UK NA rev3 is 173bhp,
UK NA rev4 & 5 is 168bhp.
Mark Edwards
Posts: 11298
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:27 am
Location: Eastbourne
Contact:

Re: is it a myth?

Post by Mark Edwards »

jimGTS wrote:turbo, rev1/2 220bhp, rev3+ 245bhp!


Rev1/2 225ps (222bhp), Rev3+ 245ps (241bhp)
JohnnyC
Posts: 7001
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:25 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: is it a myth?

Post by JohnnyC »

I think we need a facts area somewhere on the site to rival the 'know ur 2' on MR2OC :)
Rob
Posts: 1407
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 6:48 pm
Location: Baydon, Wiltshire

Re: is it a myth?

Post by Rob »

Rev 3's were 173/4 bhp and Pre rev 3 were between 156 and 160 if you mean the 3SGE engine.

What people dont realise is that the rev 1 and 2's are half a second quicker to 60 than the later models. Not that this particularly matters but it makes me happier :D
Vindezal
Posts: 1609
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:33 pm
Location: Chelmsford Essex

Re: is it a myth?

Post by Vindezal »

Rob 'Zircon' Butcher wrote:Rev 3's were 173/4 bhp and Pre rev 3 were between 156 and 160 if you mean the 3SGE engine.

What people dont realise is that the rev 1 and 2's are half a second quicker to 60 than the later models. Not that this particularly matters but it makes me happier :D


Because of the TVIS on the rev1/2 better torque. I have 174 rev3 N/A.Different set up.
Rogue
Posts: 4672
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:02 pm

Re: is it a myth?

Post by Rogue »

The figures for both Japanese and UK cars are identical, but the JDM figures are given in PS, not BHP, and therefore appear slightly higher.

They're not.

Rogue
pizza boy

Re: is it a myth?

Post by pizza boy »

The torque is actually the same...its just not sitting up at 10000000000000000000000000000000000 rpm like it is on the Rev3+NA. Other factors that make the Rev3+ NA slower than rev1/2 is taller gear ratios and its heavier due to extra safety cack. I can strut in my anorak just as well as the rest of you. :wink:
KiwiMR2

Re: is it a myth?

Post by KiwiMR2 »

Range of figures in this thread :P

Here's what Iv'e always known them as:

2nd gen JDM 3SGE ~ 157hp
3rd gen JDM 3SGE ~ 173hp
4th gen JDM 3SGE ~ 200hp, 21.0kg-m of torque. (beams.....MR2 has the red head, Altezza the black head) There was only ever 1000 MR2 beams motors made.

Last time I looked into the differences etc. I found out this too:

The 3rd gen 3sge, consisted of different cams, larger valves, a variable length intake manifold with a step effect were the manifold meets the head, in order to enhance the swirl characteristics of the intake charge.The headers were of larger diameter but shorter length, to aid top end power.
Power was up about 12kw at 129kw(173hp)@7000rpm
(previously 117kw(157hp)@6500rpm).The difference on the road wasn't that noticeable over the previous gen 3sge till at least 5200rpm were the acoustic control system did its jig and openened the second intake track to take advantage of the new engine's mods.In late '95 the compression was lowered back to 10:1 in order to meet the new emission standards and as a result the power came back to 125kw(167hp)@7000rpm .


Thought that was quite intresting :)

Cheers
KiwiMR2
Dave Couzens
Posts: 562
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 8:24 am
Location: Bristol

Re: is it a myth?

Post by Dave Couzens »

Rob 'Zircon' Butcher wrote:Rev 3's were 173/4 bhp and Pre rev 3 were between 156 and 160 if you mean the 3SGE engine.

What people dont realise is that the rev 1 and 2's are half a second quicker to 60 than the later models. Not that this particularly matters but it makes me happier :D


I understood it to be 158bhp for the rev1 and 154 for the rev2 due to the cat taking a few horses off the same engine. :P
stevowaring

Re: is it a myth?

Post by stevowaring »

So what are the 0-60 times for the different revs of MR2, N/A and Turbo?

Steve
jimGTS
Posts: 14024
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: North Kent

Re: is it a myth?

Post by jimGTS »

stevowaring wrote:So what are the 0-60 times for the different revs of MR2, N/A and Turbo?

Steve


hopefully im right with this

rev1/2 NA 0-60 7.2
rev3+ NA 0-60 7.7
rev1/2 tubby 0-60 5.7
rev3+ tubby 0-60 5.3
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”