
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.


10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.


Hope this is ok for everyone.



Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
CosmosblueMR2 wrote:woo-hoo snuck inside the top 10![]()
![]()
good work Chelle![]()
=D>
![]()
ps.my Torque fig was 251ft/lbs on the second run
![]()
Bry wrote:
I'll get you next time Franky boy![]()
CosmosblueMR2 wrote:Bry wrote:
I'll get you next time Franky boy![]()
next time I'm going on first not LAST- I want them to make sure they get a reading of the first run not my THIRD
![]()
![]()
oh and I should be fully HKS'd and mapped by next spring(just intime to change turbo
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
).
Bry wrote:
Cool,should be interesting what figures we both get again,as apart from our turbos we've taken different routes with tunning our engines.Lets hope they both stay in one piece[-o<
![]()
CosmosblueMR2 wrote:Bry wrote:
Cool,should be interesting what figures we both get again,as apart from our turbos we've taken different routes with tunning our engines.Lets hope they both stay in one piece[-o<
![]()
the HKS"may" be a stopgap.
.
but for
£200 for the fuel computer, looms and boost electronic controller it seemed silly not too
- now that i know a decent RR place to map HKS and not charge horrendus prices.
I"may" go PFC next year with new turbo, depends on how the HKS performs really.
.
what you think Bry?.
.
HKS Fcon piggy v's PFC
?
- much in it
? performance wise
?
![]()
CosmosblueMR2 wrote:
ps.my Torque fig was 251ft/lbs on the second run
![]()
jimGTS wrote:theres me at 13psi peeps!
CosmosblueMR2 wrote:jimGTS wrote:theres me at 13psi peeps!
Leave it Jim- I may bite
!
![]()