Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

smudge
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by smudge »

With all the Revisions out there I've been wondering which is considered the best on the N/A and Turbos models?
cvega666
Posts: 2616
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:43 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by cvega666 »

i think they all have their dis/advantages, and each revision owner will claim theirs is the best, but i think rev3> is what you want... all depends on long term goals...
Current: 2007 Porsche Cayman S
Gone: '94 rev3 NA, '92 rev2 Turbo forged, '07 Civic Type-R
Rogue
Posts: 4672
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:02 pm

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by Rogue »

smudge wrote:With all the Revisions out there I've been wondering which is considered the best on the N/A and Turbos models?


5.
Rosssco
Posts: 908
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by Rosssco »

Rogue wrote:
smudge wrote:With all the Revisions out there I've been wondering which is considered the best on the N/A and Turbos models?


5.


Not 6? :wink: :lol:
ryan
Posts: 2628
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:09 pm
Location: Abergavenny,South Wales

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by ryan »

Rogue wrote:
smudge wrote:With all the Revisions out there I've been wondering which is considered the best on the N/A and Turbos models?


5.


What makes you say this Patrick?
As far as I know

rev4 onwards had:
improved ABS,
S/Steel sills,
passenger airbag,
wing indicators (no toblerones)
green tint instead of rev1-3 brown windows
?improved block design around water pump?

rev 5 had lighter wheels (but uglier IMO)
different spoiler (and again a bit ugly IMO) [-(
red clocks and red stitching
front wheel speed flaps
RST
Posts: 2891
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: Inverness, Scotland

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by RST »

This is such a personal choice and so many take theirs and try and make them what they want them to be. Why do you want to know? I don't think -you are going to be able to select the "best spec" and go out and buy one.

My 2p worth. Rev 2 looks any day (spoiler and rear lights). It's the car it was meant to look! But either (rev 5) gen 4 3SGE or (rev 3+) gen 3 3SGTE engine. I had no quarms with my UKDM gen 2 3SGE, but not the best engine combo out there. I'm not that fussed personally about ABS, TRC, air bags etc -everything else is easy changeable I guess.
Steve Horrocks
Posts: 7172
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 6:39 pm
Location: Oldham

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by Steve Horrocks »

Rosssco wrote:
Rogue wrote:
smudge wrote:With all the Revisions out there I've been wondering which is considered the best on the N/A and Turbos models?


5.


Not 6? :wink: :lol:


:clap: :clap:
476bhp & 415ft lb @ 1.9bar Magic by Ryan!
Gone, but never forgotten
Now with a mk1.5 & a NHB EP3
uglee
Posts: 934
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 12:38 pm
Location: Ayrshire

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by uglee »

ryan wrote:

What makes you say this Patrick?
As far as I know
S/Steel sills,


You mean sillplates maybe?

I wish my rev4 sills were stainless. They're more like swiss cheese after last winter.
JDM-MAT
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:12 pm
Location: Ollerton, Nottinghamshire

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by JDM-MAT »

RST wrote:This is such a personal choice and so many take theirs and try and make them what they want them to be. Why do you want to know? I don't think -you are going to be able to select the "best spec" and go out and buy one.

My 2p worth. Rev 2 looks any day (spoiler and rear lights). It's the car it was meant to look! But either (rev 5) gen 4 3SGE or (rev 3+) gen 3 3SGTE engine. I had no quarms with my UKDM gen 2 3SGE, but not the best engine combo out there. I'm not that fussed personally about ABS, TRC, air bags etc -everything else is easy changeable I guess.

So how does a rev 1 different to a rev2? I'm unsure never seen them side by side
Steve-O 2007
Posts: 6233
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:54 pm

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by Steve-O 2007 »

JDM-MAT wrote:
RST wrote:This is such a personal choice and so many take theirs and try and make them what they want them to be. Why do you want to know? I don't think -you are going to be able to select the "best spec" and go out and buy one.

My 2p worth. Rev 2 looks any day (spoiler and rear lights). It's the car it was meant to look! But either (rev 5) gen 4 3SGE or (rev 3+) gen 3 3SGTE engine. I had no quarms with my UKDM gen 2 3SGE, but not the best engine combo out there. I'm not that fussed personally about ABS, TRC, air bags etc -everything else is easy changeable I guess.

So how does a rev 1 different to a rev2? I'm unsure never seen them side by side


Looks of the Rev1 but uprated stuff eg brakes etc :wink:

I would say Rev5 as its newer but depends what your wanting to do I think eg leave stock or mod it
riot68
Posts: 1840
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:54 am
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire
Contact:

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by riot68 »

I prefer looks of rev1 and 2, so for me would be rev2 but I have a rev1, no right answers, depends what you want and what you want to do with it. Budget will of course be a big influence, which is why I have a rev1 :) ... J.
Vampire
Posts: 682
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: Somerset UK

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by Vampire »

surely its the rev 3? its the cheapest car with the best spec for the money (ct20 turbo, metal headgasket, oval rear lights, better spoiler)
HighwayStar
Posts: 4273
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: in front
Contact:

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by HighwayStar »

As has been said already it's horses for courses. The big change from rev1 to 2 lies in suspension since mounting points and geometry were changed in an attempt to make the car more err, 'manageable'. Bigger brakes are the next most obvious change.

I love the basic nature of my rev1. No abs, pas, a/c, airbags etc. but then for many they would be the reasons to go for the later cars. The question is what sort of vehicle do you want....

R.
riot68
Posts: 1840
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:54 am
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire
Contact:

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by riot68 »

Me too, I like the back to basics as my second car, no abs, p/s etc. and putting the key in the door, not done that for a good while...
smudge
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by smudge »

I not after buying another car... I've got a Rev2 and love it. It's just something I was thinking about in my lorry (if your the south west Or Wales way and a lorry flashes to let you in, it's probably me cos why would someone flash you in when you've just passed a lorry bumbling along at 56mph and your doing 70mph :^o ) to pass the time. The only thing I've never liked is the look of the later Revs wheels, skinny 5 spoked things like the ones on the MRS.
JDM-MAT
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:12 pm
Location: Ollerton, Nottinghamshire

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by JDM-MAT »

Why not do a poll and see what's the popular vote?
Moo
Posts: 1739
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Newmarket, Suffolk

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by Moo »

JDM-MAT wrote:Why not do a poll and see what's the popular vote?



Because 99% would vote for their own rev and all you'd end up finding out is the split of ownership between revisions :lol:

From a technical point of view you'd have to say the rev 5 was the best as it was last evolution. From a personal preference point of view it's a question you can't answer as it's each to their own.
TheBaker
Posts: 392
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:38 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Musselburgh

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by TheBaker »

I've got a rev2 but I'd want a rev 5 simply as it's the most up to date and refined. :)

Rev 5 turbo is the dream. 8)
ryan
Posts: 2628
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:09 pm
Location: Abergavenny,South Wales

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by ryan »

Moo wrote:
JDM-MAT wrote:Why not do a poll and see what's the popular vote?



Because 99% would vote for their own rev and all you'd end up finding out is the split of ownership between revisions :lol:

From a technical point of view you'd have to say the rev 5 was the best as it was last evolution. From a personal preference point of view it's a question you can't answer as it's each to their own.


But technically the rev5 has no improvements over the rev 4?
HighwayStar
Posts: 4273
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: in front
Contact:

Re: Best Revision N/A and Turbo?

Post by HighwayStar »

front speed flaps. different (not sure if 'better') rear spoiler. lighter wheels.
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”