








Anyway, I'll duck out of this thread.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Keri-WMS wrote:Sure- although we were talking about the weight saving aspect, a potential 20kg saving is the same as the passenger seat and both door cards combined.
.
.
.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anyway, I'll duck out of this thread.
Tiamat wrote:Keri-WMS wrote:Sure- although we were talking about the weight saving aspect, a potential 20kg saving is the same as the passenger seat and both door cards combined.
.
.
.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anyway, I'll duck out of this thread.
It started off as that, it was when we got ot prices and what wheels fit over it, changed the nature of it.![]()
No problem though, just trying to keep on topic.
Keri-WMS wrote:
Back back to the car, if you're seriously trying to save every gram(and are doing the the suspension from scratch) then surely the car to start with is a Rev 1
(import) tin top?
kaiowas wrote:Keri-WMS wrote:
Back back to the car, if you're seriously trying to save every gram(and are doing the the suspension from scratch) then surely the car to start with is a Rev 1
(import) tin top?
Do it properly and start with a mk1 tbh
pbmr2 wrote:the mk3 might be a much better starting point(weight wise) but where is the challenge in that? they are under the 1000kg as standard, are they not?
Rogue wrote:adding an auxiliary long range fuel tank
pbmr2 wrote:what weight are the v6 engines?
MartG wrote:Where did you manage to squeeze an extra tank in- can't have been very big