






Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
King Stromba wrote:I read the spoiler creates low pressure over the engine which aids the flow of air over the engine and increases cooling.Id leave it be.
Digital wrote:The American market mk1 didn't have a rear spoiler did it? I wouldn't imagine it would make that much difference sub 100mph.
tonigmr2 wrote:Fear me, for I am watching
Speedy wrote:Digital wrote:The American market mk1 didn't have a rear spoiler did it? I wouldn't imagine it would make that much difference sub 100mph.
IIRC, there was a lower spec'ed mk1 in the US with a sub 1600cc engine which didn't have the rear spoiler.
Speedy wrote:Digital wrote:The American market mk1 didn't have a rear spoiler did it? I wouldn't imagine it would make that much difference sub 100mph.
IIRC, there was a lower spec'ed mk1 in the US with a sub 1600cc engine which didn't have the rear spoiler.
Scarface GTti wrote:I doubt the car will ever reach more than 100 mph on any of the tracks i`m thinking of running it on, so would the full removal of the bodykit upset the handling or is it best to leave it on?
King Stromba wrote:I read the spoiler creates low pressure over the engine which aids the flow of air over the engine and increases cooling.Id leave it be.