










Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
monkeyra wrote:That says it's for a scooby?
Dave_1987 wrote:Thanks.Thats very similar to what iv set mine to.
Now i have seen yours i know im somewhere near.
People seem to run 3+ degrees of camber on the front which i was unsure if it was a bit overkill.
Mid engined cars dont usually have lots of front camber.
Gee Man wrote:Here you go mate
Image Replaced With URL For Quote
![]()
[url]http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z211/Gee_Man-23/IMG_20170322_195735.jpg
[/URL]
Gazza_DJ wrote:Gee Man wrote:Here you go mate
Image Replaced With URL For Quote
![]()
[url]http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z211/Gee_Man-23/IMG_20170322_195735.jpg
[/URL]
Am I reading that right, 42 minutes total toe in at the rear? Seems quite high?
Gee Man wrote:
Yeah mate that's correct.Helps when braking.
The place that set it up are a race team essentially.
Awesome place but really expensive
![]()
Gazza_DJ wrote:Yeah, I'm at about-2deg all round on mine.
For a little while I had
~1.5 degrees more camber at the front than the back
(mistake when putting the car back together after having the rear subframe off), and I really didn't like it, shifted the balance of the car massively to oversteer and not a in a good way!
Race Idiot- spacers might not be necessary, sometimes you can obtain the clearance required by adding a little bit of positive camber at the hub
(most coilovers have a bit of adjustment via slotted holes where it mounts to the hub), and compensating by adding more negative camber at the top mount.
Obviously depends on widths and offsets of the front wheel etc.