![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
My new fronts are 7J and are fitted with 205/45/16s too, but I just think they look a bit wide on the car.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
I'm favouring the 50 over the 45 as the roads round here aren't great so the extra wall height will be nice.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Thanks in advance
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Martin
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![thumleft :thumleft:](./images/smilies/icon_thumleft.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Johnr32 wrote:Chunky= win, no?
195-50 will be chunkier than what your currently running so you definately wont like it, go for 195-45..
59sw20 wrote:I chose 195-55 instead of 195-50 because the Falken ZE912 has 420 treadwear on the 50, and 360 on the 55.![]()
May I ask, where is the speedometer sensor located? front or rear wheels?