Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Posts about anything do to with modifying your car such as fitting aftermarket parts, bodykit, or tuning the engine for more performance.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

FizzyBlueMr2
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 12:51 pm
Location: South Wales

Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by FizzyBlueMr2 »

Hi,

Anybody on here got a Rogue Systems Charge Cooler fitted? Thinking of upgrading my standard IC, and wondered how much it costs, whether installation was expensive etc, and whether it could be a diy job?

Any comments on results, quality, things to watch out for (like how do you tell the waters low? :wink: ).

A few things that may be in my favour is that I have a uk n/a with a turbo engine transplant, and as such has no air conditioning - more room/easier access for rad etc?

- Ian.
Mikejc
Posts: 2622
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 8:23 pm
Location: london

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by Mikejc »

Like yourself my car also started life as a UK N/A. And I also have the Roque Systems C/C that you mentioned.

Many are now going to come forward and tell you how restrictive the C/C is when trying to flow more than 1.2 bar. Some will also tell you that you would be better off spending your money on an uprated I/C.

I can only tell you what I have learned from having both an uprated I/C (Spearco) and the Rogue Systems/Pace C/C.....

The C/C wins hands down. It has completely transformed the way my car performs for the better, leaving me with more power, more of the time and all of this even lower in the rev range than before!

It is expensive at nearly £1000.00, but I do think that in this case you do get what you pay for. ie a complete kit that has all that's needed to complete the install. The instructions included were not all that great to be honest but i'm led to believe that this has now been sorted out? In any case the kit is quite straight forward to fit. You will come across a small problem, as did I, when mounting the pre-rad at the front of the car. Simply because the pre-rad was designed to use one of the existing mounts on the air con rad. Some thing our UK cars don't have! It's an easy fix though with a little imagination ;)

The restriction I mentioned was experienced by a guy named Niel Johnson, a member of IMOC. He's car had the original prototype fitted to it. After some time spent on the dyno, it was discovered that Neils car had a restriction some where in the system, and all fingers pointed towards the Roque C/C core not being able to flow any more than 1.2 bar efficiently. However, it is thought that the core that Neil recieved was different from that of the one's made their after, for general sale. And that these are now able to flow up to 1.5 bar efficiently.

So to sum up, I would have to say that to date the Roque C/C is the best money i've spent on the car so far :D

Mikejc
Mikejc
Posts: 2622
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 8:23 pm
Location: london

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by Mikejc »

Just had a quick read through my post there and realized that i'd not mentioned (in so many words) that i've also fitted a 3S-GTE lump :oops:

Mikejc
raptor95GTS
Posts: 6213
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by raptor95GTS »

Mikejc wrote:Just had a quick read through my post there and realized that i'd not mentioned (in so many words) that i've also fitted a 3S-GTE lump :oops:

Mikejc


edit mike, you can edit now :lol: :lol:
FizzyBlueMr2
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 12:51 pm
Location: South Wales

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by FizzyBlueMr2 »

Hi,

So, does this mean that you fitted it yourself? How tricky is it to do - wondering where the pipework is best routed to the front of the car as well? Roughly how long did it take you?

As its me only car, I would have to either see if I can do it in a weekend, or take some time off it it was going to be longer..... ;)

- Ian.
Mikejc
Posts: 2622
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 8:23 pm
Location: london

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by Mikejc »

Like said it's not very hard. I and a friend fitted mine in about 5 hours and I only think it took this long because the insruction led us in the wrong direction a couple of times :oops:

The most time consuming part was removing the front bumper and then fitting the pre-rad. But only because we had to make our own brackets to hold it in place. Running the pipe work back will explain itself once your under their, if that makes sense!?

Their are other option to the Roque/Pace kit, for example, you can use the C/C from the GT-4. It would work out a fair bit cheaper to go down this route, but then you will need to fabricate a few bits and bobs to complete the install. Which is why I just decided to buy the complete kit from Roque Systems, because i'm lazy :lol:

Hope this helps
Mikejc
FizzyBlueMr2
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 12:51 pm
Location: South Wales

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by FizzyBlueMr2 »

5 Hours??? And thats INCLUDING taking the front bumper off? Wow..

My brother and I changed the front bumper on my old n/a (the original was splitting - looked like a dodgy repair :( ) and it took us ages to get all the bolts out, especially as the front wheel had to come off to get access to the wheel arches for a couple of the more obscure nuts? A fair few broke off too.. :(

What sort of facilities were you using (if you don't mind me asking?) - I'll have access to a drive and a couple of trolley jacks.... ;)
Matt@Rogue
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Midlands
Contact:

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by Matt@Rogue »

We do offer a fitting service and its costs £250... not cheap i know but it takes the best part of a day and plus it will be installed correctly ahem 'Mike' ahem. It is quite fiddly to do without the use of a lift but as mike has proved it can be done.

HTH's,

Matt.
Mikejc
Posts: 2622
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 8:23 pm
Location: london

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by Mikejc »

lol Matt :wink:

Tools wise we had nothing special...a jack, four axle stands and a standed tool kit. All the work was carried out in a friends humble garage. We did it over two days in the end. On the first day we just mounted the pre-rad and run the pipe work back to where the C/C would be. On the secound day we fitted the C/C, accompanying pipe work and the pump :wink:

Mikejc
jonno
Posts: 1157
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:34 pm
Location: Derby
Contact:

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by jonno »

I suppose this is as good a place as any to post yesterdays results from Thor with the new CC core in place.

337bhp and 320lbft, slightly less power (it was 345bhp), but Pete managed to find another 20lbs of torque!.

Essentially its no diffferent to the old core though, still seeing exactly the same problem.

Until someone proves different I suspect that the outright limit of the Pace CC is about 380bhp at the flywheel.

Out of interest though I looked at Andy F's plots from last Saturday against mine. I am getting 20 lbft of torque more than Andy even though he made about 60bhp more. I think this is entirely down to the Pace CC core cooling the intake charge MUCH better than the spearco, but also being much more restrictive. If Pace would just make the core 3" wider I think it would be fantastic, its just a shame that they made is so small!. The frustrating part is that there is enough room to make it larger - I am going to call them tommorow and explain my findings, maybe they will do something about it.

For what its worth I really rate the Pace CC core for Hybrid turbos or even something like a GT28rs - its just not big enough for the GT30+ guys. If you want excellent cooling and predictable response then you will struggle to find a better kit on the market at the minute. There are other guys working on alternatives but none are quite ready yet - I am hoping that one of them will be on test for the Rolling Road day at Noble Motorsports on the 26th March but we will have to wait and see.

Neil.
Forever Feels Like Home, Sitting All Alone Inside Your Head...
nutter

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by nutter »

Just out of insterest. Does the pace CC pre-rad fit on cars with aircon?? Or do you have to ditch it?
Mikejc
Posts: 2622
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 8:23 pm
Location: london

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by Mikejc »

No need to ditch the air con Dean. It was designed to fit along with it, ie it uses one of the brackets from the a/c itself. My car never had a/c to start with which is why I had make my own brackets to fit the pre-rad :wink:

Mikejc
jonno
Posts: 1157
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:34 pm
Location: Derby
Contact:

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by jonno »

I have just taken these pictures for anyone that is interested!

Click on them for hi-res versions.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
MR2Mania
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:37 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by MR2Mania »

jonno wrote:Image


Neil, what's the relevance of Muddly Talker then? :)
jonno
Posts: 1157
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:34 pm
Location: Derby
Contact:

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by jonno »

Neil, what's the relevance of Muddly Talker then? Smile


It was to show the size - besides Muzza is a long time hero of mine - read that book cover to cover a few times now. He is an incredible man :)
Forever Feels Like Home, Sitting All Alone Inside Your Head...
Andy F
Posts: 2384
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Leeds utd

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by Andy F »

The actual unit looks quite big there Neil, so does that go in the stock location??
jonno
Posts: 1157
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:34 pm
Location: Derby
Contact:

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by jonno »

Yep, it drops into the stock location. The outside dimensions are about 20% smaller than the Spearco although the internals probably look much different.

It may be something with my engine yet, I honestly dont know. I am just going down the route of swapping the CC core to prove it one way or the other. Especially since a restriction in the CC core would cause my symptoms. Knowing my luck it will be something else but until I rule it out my money is on the CC.
Forever Feels Like Home, Sitting All Alone Inside Your Head...
John Rees

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by John Rees »

Knowing my luck it will be something else but until I rule it out my money is on the CC.


And you'd know a lot about spending money Neil, I shudder to think :shock:

John
TBDevelopments

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by TBDevelopments »

jonno do you think the way the core is constucted might have anything to do with it? I have a long chat with pace on the matter of chargecooler design and they seem to be doing it completely different to everyone else.....

If you look at the other big chargecooler names like spearco and PWR you will notice the internals of the cooler is like on normal intercoolers with channels through the intercooler and small fins transfering the heat to the air, apart that there surrounded in a water jacket so effectivly have cold water remove the heat. Now i know this works as spearco chargecoolers have been used on very high bhp mr2 including the 1000bhp extremeboost car.

Now if you look at the pace design they have the boost air flowing through the small metal fins on the coolers faces and the water flowing through the "normal intercooler" flow channels.

Do you think this might have an effect on the flow of the chargecooler itself as the surface area of the faces is much less once you account for all the fins than the area through the internal channels.................just an idea.....

I know the designs are different, but don't know about flows in the 2 versions as they've never had a side by side test in same sizes but it seems that one works very well where the other is only ok.

There is a chargecooler from spearco in a single core which is around the same size of the pace core and they rate this to a much higher flow.

Tim
xxxx
paul port
Posts: 1472
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 10:50 am
Location: Buckinghamshire

Re: Rogue Systems Charge Cooler

Post by paul port »

xxxx wrote:

If you look at the other big chargecooler names like spearco and PWR you will notice the internals of the cooler is like on normal intercoolers with channels through the intercooler and small fins transfering the heat to the air, apart that there surrounded in a water jacket so effectivly have cold water remove the heat. Now i know this works as spearco chargecoolers have been used on very high bhp mr2 including the 1000bhp extremeboost car.

Now if you look at the pace design they have the boost air flowing through the small metal fins on the coolers faces and the water flowing through the "normal intercooler" flow channels.

There is a chargecooler from spearco in a single core which is around the same size of the pace core and they rate this to a much higher flow.

Tim
xxxx


Looking at it, the air path open area appears much greater than any normal core- And remember, that since water is more efficient at conducting heat away, it won’t need as much surface to work with – besides, I don't think the pace core cooling efficiency is in question as it appears to work.

Regarding the Spearco cores, all of the ones I can think of have a larger surface area through which the air passes compared to the water passage. This is normal in a single core cooler - and is why it will be rated for a higher flow... Each individual core in the Pace cooler is effectively built this way. However, I believe the pace design is a 4-core cooler, one core stacked after the other, which is why the air path cross section appears smaller than the water path.

EG, if you have found a Spearco core of similar external dimension, the air will be passing through the shortest dimension – not down the longest dimension. Greater open core area = rated for higher flow, though it may not cool as efficiently as the 4-stage pace design. The other thing to note about Spearco, is that all their cores are ‘Bar and Plate’ not Tube/Fin – which means Spearco can manufacture the core to have any combination of Air cross section Vs Water cross section they want…. They are not limited to the size of pre-extruded tubes as pace are.

The pace products website shows how the multi-core products are designed, and how the cooling water flows from one core to the next etc.

Paul
Post Reply

Return to “Modifications”