Ha! Hahahaha. Sorry, please excuse my laughterI just find it hilarious that the advertising agency employed by Microsoft thought they could get away with showing PS3 Final Fantasy XIII scenes."Wot, it's the same game, innit?"
Sparked by an eagle-eyed British viewer, who dobbed in the commercial to the Advertising Standards Authority, the commercial was swiftly yanked following a comparison of gameplay between the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions.
The ASA commented that "we noted that there was a discernible difference in the picture quality of the twothe PS3 image in video sequences appeared sharper and colors were more vivid than those of the Xxbox 360."
que the "well sony has done this blah blah blah"
i no when the ps3 first came out some game stores were just sticking cardboard covers of the ps3 over the xbox
why do people care? its a game, they all look good no matter what console even if there is a 2% difference,
fanboys really do annoy me, anyway I am off to do some work on my Apple laptop which is better than windows, and then play some xbox which is better than PS3 and then drive my RX7 which is better than an MR2,
fizz wrote:i think you missed the point.. its amusing how MS could not be bothered to take 5 min out to film their own gameplay and used Sony footage..
So?
Really, it's been years now since the PS3 launch let alone the 360 and people are still bickering about petty things no one else really cares about.
Most people just dont give a xxxx.
fizz wrote:i think you missed the point.. its amusing how MS could not be bothered to take 5 min out to film their own gameplay and used Sony footage..
So?
Really, it's been years now since the PS3 launch let alone the 360 and people are still bickering about petty things no one else really cares about.
Most people just dont give a xxxx.
because people really give a toss about the crap that you post matt?
If you don't care then why do you feel the need to post?
just do what i generally do when i see anything you've posted, Ignore it
fizz wrote:i think you missed the point.. its amusing how MS could not be bothered to take 5 min out to film their own gameplay and used Sony footage..
Because MS didn't make the advert?
Matt's right though, all this MS/Sony fanboyism is actually worse than the days of the Amiga/ST. And it was bad enough then.
fizz wrote:i think you missed the point.. its amusing how MS could not be bothered to take 5 min out to film their own gameplay and used Sony footage..
Because MS didn't make the advert?
Matt's right though, all this MS/Sony fanboyism is actually worse than the days of the Amiga/ST. And it was bad enough then.
Thank you.
I was simply pointing out that I thought perhaps fanboi's from BOTH camps had finally got over it and just got on with things.
But it seems not. And It seems people are just as childish and pathetic as ever.
fizz wrote:i think you missed the point.. its amusing how MS could not be bothered to take 5 min out to film their own gameplay and used Sony footage..
Because MS didn't make the advert?
Matt's right though, all this MS/Sony fanboyism is actually worse than the days of the Amiga/ST. And it was bad enough then.
Thank you.
I was simply pointing out that I thought perhaps fanboi's from BOTH camps had finally got over it and just got on with things.
But it seems not. And It seems people are just as childish and pathetic as ever.
It was a news article that was comical and you are the one who tried to make it something more.
If you want to talk about childish and pathetic then maybe you should take a closer look at yourself and your own life
Com·i·cal    /ˈkɒmɪkəl [kom-i-kuhl] adjective
1. Producing laughter; amusing; funny: a comical fellow.
2. Obsolete . pertaining to or of the nature of comedy.
Nope, neither of those so definitely not comical
Where was the article btw?
ekona wrote:Com·i·cal    /ˈkɒmɪkəl [kom-i-kuhl] adjective
1. Producing laughter; amusing; funny: a comical fellow.
2. Obsolete . pertaining to or of the nature of comedy.
Nope, neither of those so definitely not comical
Where was the article btw?
Grow up Mikee.
Do you still hang around in the school playground and call people names?
Or was it you that got called names?
And what kind of name is Mikee any way? It sounds like a 4 year old.
matt_mr2t wrote:Grow up Mikee.
Do you still hang around in the school playground and call people names?
Or was it you that got called names?
And what kind of name is Mikee any way? It sounds like a 4 year old.
i never called you a name matt, i can if you wish?
mikee is a user name, do people call you matt_mr2t?
matt_mr2t wrote:Grow up Mikee.
Do you still hang around in the school playground and call people names?
Or was it you that got called names?
And what kind of name is Mikee any way? It sounds like a 4 year old.
Im not even involved yet and the threads already gone down the pan.
Sorry Mikee but nothing will ever beat Sony using Forza 3 to advertise GT5
Both cases were epic failures tho!
matt_mr2t wrote:Grow up Mikee.
Do you still hang around in the school playground and call people names?
Or was it you that got called names?
And what kind of name is Mikee any way? It sounds like a 4 year old.
Im not even involved yet and the threads already gone down the pan.
Sorry Mikee but nothing will ever beat Sony using Forza 3 to advertise GT5
Both cases were epic failures tho!
tbh Sam i'm pretty sure thats just an internet myth mate, but if true is an epic failure!
Got a link?
fizz wrote:i think you missed the point.. its amusing how MS could not be bothered to take 5 min out to film their own gameplay and used Sony footage..
Because MS didn't make the advert?
Matt's right though, all this MS/Sony fanboyism is actually worse than the days of the Amiga/ST. And it was bad enough then.
fizz wrote:i think you missed the point.. its amusing how MS could not be bothered to take 5 min out to film their own gameplay and used Sony footage..
Because MS didn't make the advert?
Matt's right though, all this MS/Sony fanboyism is actually worse than the days of the Amiga/ST. And it was bad enough then.
