

I'd really appreciate it!!
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
llenrub wrote:I am inclined to agree with you.Have you got their contact details?
I'd really appreciate it!!
llenrub wrote:Fraziers notback untill the 18/4.
![]()
Do you think I should have PTS stop work on the rebuild untill he gets back?
ENSMR2 wrote:I spoke to Fensport a while back about this.They said if the cylinder wall has a thickness of 160 thou then we should be ok.
Any thing less and it's a no no more or less.
What kind of results should we expect from an ultrasonic test? Or should I say what result will mean we are ok and what will mean we aren't? Just so I know what I'm looking for when I get it done.![]()
Or is this(ultrasonic test) just a measure of the thickness.
In which case I already know it should be 160 thou.
N
ENSMR2 wrote:Also what about the ultrasonic test result I asked about.What should I be hoping for when I get it tested?
llenrub wrote:Talking of pregnancy, I phoned the hospital and told them,"my wife is expecting, expecting a new car, could I bring it down for an ultrasound test.
" they said,
"yeah, I think so" but sounded a little confused!!
llenrub wrote:Anyway.I'm amazed that the thickness of the block wall could be less than 160 thousanths
!!
ENSMR2 wrote:Hey guys, what are your views on this.
ENSMR2 wrote:I spoke to a mate about this.He reckons that if we can get our rad fans to run for a little after the engine is off then it would still cool the coolant/water.
The cool water would sink below the warm water thus moving it round the system.
Allbeit at a slower rate than having the pump running.
ENSMR2 wrote:Also on road cars for example, as part of the warm down process we could have The rad fans on a switch so that when we are coming to then end of our drive we could turn them on to help get more air at the rad especially use full when stopped at the lights.
OK, firstly, I don't think we're concentrating on the right thing, here! After all, it's just one guy's theory that reckons a heavier cap will stop the block from cracking because he reckons it's related to the coolant temp.I don't! I think it's simply because certain blocks are too thin and collapse from the extreme cylinder pressures!!
ENSMR2 wrote:Ok ok I'm still learning and my mate doesn't know 2's![]()
![]()
What about a lower rated thermostat?
ENSMR2 wrote:I know what you are saying.
But since it is not actually proven, and Toyota won't admit there being a problem isn't it wise to consider all factors?
ENSMR2 wrote:Don't the japs have any more info on this? Seeming as they got the rev3 engine in their domestic market I'm sure they must have more info then we.
Any one speak Japanese?
JJ wrote:lol!!
How the hell have I missed this post
????????
![]()
![]()
More input later.
Magoo out!
![]()
MR2Mania wrote:
That's a good point.I've got a very good friend that is normally based out there, but here's over here at the moment.
I guess when he goes back, he can look into it for us, by talking to some well-known 3SGTE tuners out there.