yup, i fully accept that, its simular to Quincunx FSAA

(full screen anti-aliasing) on a computer.

ignoring the standard forms of FSAA, Quincunx uses is an algorithm that the graphics card uses to increase the pixel count over that of an original frame, however it is not totaly acurate to what could possibly have been in the original

"missing" pixel area.

And i dare say thats what the Sony AV unit does.

It bumps the pixels, but the image displayed will not be accurate, colours will be off, it will have soft edges when directly compared to a genuine HD original and the quality will not increase, but it will look a little more pleasing to the eye than without it.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.but that is only if the av box actualy does what ive just suggested it might.

.

.

.

.

.

.else my previous post probably still stands.

now for a bit of a pondering Phip moment-

if your putting 480i or p into the Sony AV i would have thought it will be passable but not particulary better than putting it on a normal screen.

if your putting 720i or p in then you would probably have better results but theres not compromise for the full 1080p

(note for those who dont know, the letter

"i" after a number indicates

"interlaced" meaning half the resolution cleaverly displayed using interlacing to produce the illusion of full resolution.

the letter

"p" after a number signifies that the full resolution can genuinly be displayed in full constantly.

"p" is your friend!

)