
wes wrote:
the reason why the bluray discs arent full is because to fill'em they would have to spend so


So it's nothing to do with the speed that BD reads at?

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
wes wrote:
the reason why the bluray discs arent full is because to fill'em they would have to spend so
PS3 all the way.I know 360's breakdown quite a lot.
.
.something about the ring of death people say.
![]()
No subscription fee for online pay.![]()
the only way you can compare graphics is to have two identical tvs next to each other not looking on gametrailers
gametrailer videos are a pathetic excuse for a argument
i agree the xbox has got more games at the mo but it was released a year before so it will have but the theres going to be loads of more exclusives for the ps3 coming out HOME,ferrari challenge, haze, wipeout HD, gt5, metal gear solid, rfom2
Bender Unit wrote:I used to long for Amiga games of old, got an emulator played a few, questioned why I was messing around with such dull repetitive games and went back to the 360!
Bender Unit wrote:Hold on a moment surley MS could just release a blue Ray player for the 360?
Stan Glasgow, president and chief operating officer of Sony Electronics, has revealed that the Japanese electronics maker is in talks with Microsoft about offering a Blu-ray Disc drive for the Xbox 360.The Financial Times reports:
But after Sonys victory last month in the high-definition DVD format war, Stan Glasgow, Sony Electronics US president, said the two sides were now talking about Microsoft adopting Blu-ray.
A Blu-ray drive in a 360 would make Microsoft more competitive with the PS3, but it would also mean extra revenues for Sonys electronics division.It would also add further cost to the 360, meaning a premium edition of the console could be necessary.
![]()
nakamura wrote:Bender Unit wrote:I used to long for Amiga games of old, got an emulator played a few, questioned why I was messing around with such dull repetitive games and went back to the 360!
Most games from the snes and md era still play fantasticly.For pure gameplay you cant beat 2d.
Mario, Sonic and the like all have perfect fine tuned gameplay.
The PS3 and 360 offer nothing at all.So far the games are soulless and disappointing, not all mind just most.
You could tell the effort people used to put into making games, stories, interactive experiences.
Snes/MD to PS1 N64 was a huge jump in terms of visuals and possibilities.
PS1\N64 to PS2 xbox same again.They refined 3D gaming and gave us the online option.
![]()
PS2/Xbox to PS3/360..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.um sharper graphics.
The games released lately are throwaway titles.They will mostly be discarded and forgotten about in the future.
Again in not saying all, but i could list at least 50 Snes titles that are still good today.
![]()
LOL my point certainly doesnt help but Matt got me started!!!!
So imo if you really need a new console get a PS3 coz both machines are boring but at least it has blue ray.![]()
nakamura wrote:I did own a 360 once but i sold it after a month.
Antstarr wrote:nakamura wrote:I did own a 360 once but i sold it after a month.
Amen to that.
PS3 is the next step..
.Tekken 6, Final Fantasy, GT5.
.
.
.Xbox needs catching up or a milestone.
.
.I dont even like Halo that much.