




Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Joey wrote:My brother has an'05 one, we decided to see how my Rev3 Tubby matched up on a nearby deserted airfield
nothing in it up to 120mph.
![]()
CosmosblueMR2 wrote:Joey wrote:My brother has an'05 one, we decided to see how my Rev3 Tubby matched up on a nearby deserted airfield
nothing in it up to 120mph.
![]()
then what![]()
paulmann wrote:Well dont mean to be a big head but I own both cars!
There has been been 4 revisions of the 350Z already.![]()
The first engines pushing out 270BHP to the one I own which pushes out 309bhp.
![]()
The engine in the 350Z is one of the best engines in the world, apparently(according to the industry polls, the engine has been around a while and has been in the top 10 best engines for ten years on the trot now).
I would reckon the standard rev3 tubby v standard 350z would be a dead heat.![]()
They have similar 0-60 speeds but when it gets to about 120mph the 350Z would pull ahead as its really does pull hard to the rev limiter in all gears but is limited to 155MPH.
Both cars are great in their own ways.
After driving them with passion on B roads I would say the Zed is the easier to drive and holds the road really well oozing confidence.![]()
Whilst the 2 as we know needs your full attention but rewards you more.
What I like about my zed is it feels(to me anyways) like a lighter, nimbler car that it actually is.
What I like about my 2 is that is a pocket rocket and scares me more!
oh, the zed feels slower because of the lack of torque that you get from a turbo, watching the speedo move up dispels that feeling instantly.![]()
It is quick.
![]()
But like all cars should be quicker.