Forum member ages etc. (split from Saw 4 thread in OT)

[Lauren]

Rules Kept to lol its a perk of the job that the rules are bent

A statement like that really annoys me, because if anything its a massive downside to the role that you have to toe the line. There is no way on earth any of the mods or the committee would get away with rule breaking.

Any action taken or any issue is discussed with all the moderators being able to put their say in it. Ask Leeroy (I think it was him) what response he got when he committed the heinous crime of moderating his own thread. Honestly, heads seriously role if i or any other committee members even get a whiff of mods abusing their power. Ask Craig what happenned when he edited someone's post (for a joke) in OT... he was told if he did it again he would no longer be a mod.

Please comment on this moderators.

[Lauren]

Ultimately I think it comes down to one thing, a lot of people don't like you / the character you play here.

I suffer the same thing

And let's not forget the Q&A, that was so well moderated that people didn't even know it had mods Oh and here, that wasn't such a fun time, too difficult to get things done due to the structure in place.

but he has had the odd axe to grind at times too.

Indeed, mostly with you

Michael, I don't like you either and you know why that is don't you? I am still awaiting for an apology three years later.

Maybe one day you'll get over it and move on to something useful. Pride is a terrible thing isn't it?

[michael]

Michael, I don't like you either and you know why that is don't you? I am still awaiting for an apology three years later.

Maybe one day you'll get over it and move on to something useful. Pride is a terrible thing isn't it?

You know what, I still can't remember what it is I'm supposed to be apologising for. It seems I've forgotten about it and moved on, you seem to dwell on whatever it is.

As for pride, I have none, the thing with me is that I really don't care what other people think.

It's not that I don't like *you* BTW, I just don't like *IMOC-you*, they are quite different characters.

[Lauren]

You know what, I still can't remember what it is I'm supposed to be apologising for. It seems I've forgotten about it and moved on, you seem to dwell on whatever it is.

As for pride, I have none, the thing with me is that I really don't care what other people think.

It's not that I don't like *you* BTW, I just don't like *IMOC-you*, they are quite different characters.

Well its the same with you Michael, i have enjoyed your company when i have chatted with you at shows, its just the IMOC-you that seems to be the issue.

I think it was more Mark that needed the apology rather than me. It was a long time ago now and although i am not affected by it, Mark seems to be still upset by it, which in turn upsets me.

[nitric4k]

[michael]

I think it was more Mark that needed the apology rather than me. It was a long time ago now and although i am not affected by it, Mark seems to be still upset by it, which in turn upsets me.

I recall Mark wanting to "punch my face in" for something but again I've forgotten what, I honestly can't be ar$ed with stuff like that anymore so here we go:

Mark, for whatever it was I said to upset you I apologise, if you wish to send me a PM with the specific offence info I'll be more specific in my apology.

If you still wish to give me a beating when you next see me so be it, I'll let you have a few shots.

[Spittinflames]

http://www.imoc.co.uk/forums/viewtopic. ... highlight=

this one she jumps in thinking her opinion is right (as usual!)

http://www.imoc.co.uk/forums/viewtopic. ... c&start=20

in this shes backing up friends,even though no one knows if they are liars or not? but again laurens word is gospel over anything!

thats just a few examples i could be bothered to find!
why? i dont know.........because nothing will ever get done......as usual!

just because lauren is committee on the site dosent make her god!
and start preaching what she believes to be wrong to others!

for your info speedy,im only getting at one committee member of this club!

as for unfair,im not the only person who feels this way,but i guess in the committees eyes,of course we are wrong!

LOL! then followed by ROFLLAAB. Quality. Your arguments are so weak and so ill informed that honestly, they don't warrant discussion.

I am right most of the time, i don't see why that is so hard to accept. On the other hand if i'm wrong, i will happily admit that and have done so on countless occassions. Unlike some, i'm not too proud.

Yet again though, you bore me with weak arguments, poor logic and no suggestion that is useful or constructive.

yep,of course you are right! all the time!
i cant be bothered reading the rest of the drivvle after the first few sentences..............

seeing as you find everyones comments so funny,heres a beauty that i found which i thought was hilarious!

EDITED by ADMIN

I'm sorry but are you taking the p1$$

Edit* oh sorry i put the wrong smiley was supposed to be

[Lauren]

I recall Mark wanting to "punch my face in" for something but again I've forgotten what, I honestly can't be ar$ed with stuff like that anymore so here we go:

Mark, for whatever it was I said to upset you I apologise, if you wish to send me a PM with the specific offence info I'll be more specific in my apology.

If you still wish to give me a beating when you next see me so be it, I'll let you have a few shots.

I talked him out of that one. I'll pass it onto Mark for you.

[dude541]

hmmm why has my link disapeared???????????

EDIT

[Lauren]

hmmm why has my link disapeared???????????

hardly like it was something that was untrue..................

Read the forum rules.

[michael]

dudechap - there is a line, you crossed it, step back.

That was low, even by my standards.

You would have been banned if that had been me in control but then I don't do all the fluffy, nice moderation stuff like they have to here.

[redeye32uk]

Banned for posting an artical that been doing the rounds in pm's...?

[Lauren]

Banned for posting an artical that been doing the rounds in pm's...?

Not banned, suspended.

[StevieL]

Banned for posting an artical that been doing the rounds in pm's...?

is that the rubens barrifellow article

[Leakie Tbar]

Rules Kept to lol its a perk of the job that the rules are bent

A statement like that really annoys me, because if anything its a massive downside to the role that you have to toe the line. There is no way on earth any of the mods or the committee would get away with rule breaking.

Any action taken or any issue is discussed with all the moderators being able to put their say in it. Ask Leeroy (I think it was him) what response he got when he committed the heinous crime of moderating his own thread. Honestly, heads seriously role if i or any other committee members even get a whiff of mods abusing their power. Ask Craig what happenned when he edited someone's post (for a joke) in OT... he was told if he did it again he would no longer be a mod.

Please comment on this moderators.

Is that supposed to be Please comment on these moderators ??

It was brought up via pm with one of the commitee members who is no longer holds that position.

Do you think it would be a good idea to name the offender on the open forum ?? personaly I dont think it would !!!

Its not big and its not clever

[Leakie Tbar]

Someone Pm me the artical that has been getting PM'D about

[Leakie Tbar]

Got PM

[nitric4k]

thread requested to be deleted as its gone off topic and turned personnal

[shish]

thread requested to be deleted as its gone off topic and turned personnal

seconded, it's not like this stuff about lauren is new (least of all to me!!), its all a bit like 3 years ago now and has been discused at length before

[tonigmr2]

New low for forum abuse, well done 'Dude'. How about you (and everybody else who sees fit to swap PMs) grow up and get over it? FS.
T