xxxx and IMOC-UK

[anna]

works now
Thanks for reporting it

[EdMR2]

no probs you've told me to report posts, and as you've pointed out personal attacks are against the rules and theres been plenty of that happening of late.



Ed.

[david01554]

Hi, I have only delt with tb devlopments once, he was both prompt and helpful, I do not wish to know your reasons for his ban, but we now have no access to his knowledge?

[EdMR2]

you can always just email him

hes always expressed his intensions to help other mr2 owners despite not being on the forum anymore.

Ed.

[luthor1]

LOL! Another "1 post" person dragging up this old thread.

Mysterious indeed

[jmachling]

Indeed - time to lock it I reckon.

I think pretty much everyone who has something to say has said it now.

Send it to the archive...

[jont]

LOL! Another "1 post" person dragging up this old thread.

Mysterious indeed

Although it says they joined IMOC nearly 2 years ago - conspiracy nuts eat your heart out....

[Leakie Tbar]

I think I beat harry for the amount of smilies in 1 post
for free advertising + sponsers \/ \/

[V8Killer]

LOL! Another "1 post" person dragging up this old thread.

Mysterious indeed

Although it says they joined IMOC nearly 2 years ago - conspiracy nuts eat your heart out....

Nina Myers must be part of the committee or a moderator

[Spidey]

I'm late ! Hopefully, I have something newish to add

First - Tim was an asset and he'll be missed.
Second - Committe have rules and they need them. Rules are there to control/stop everything getting out of control. If everything was left up to mixture of gut feelings/hearsay, then policing IMOC would be a nightmare! So, rules correctly enforced - Tim agreed, so case closed.

Anyway, my point :

What I am suggesting is that the rules be reviewed - i.e. stay as is with the 3 warnings and then a ban - but maybe a 6 month or 1 year ban ? then after coming back after a ban, you get one/no warning for misconduct ? just throwing figures/ideas out.

So, my post is basically nothing to do with historic desicions, including Tim's ruling - but looking to review the "constitution"

Committee/Mods - this is intended to be a constructive post - in no way is it saying that the lifetime ban was a bad rule - just maybe should be reviewed (the ban rule, not decision on Tim) ?

hth
Rob

[luthor1]

sounds like a new thread to me...

[Lauren]

sounds like a new thread to me...

All the rules as well as other core issues are being reviewed at the moment.

[Tiamat]

To add to what lauren is saying, if anyone has any SENSIBLE suggestions, please feel free to put them in the suggestions forum.

[Steve Horrocks]

What I am suggesting is that the rules be reviewed - i.e. stay as is with the 3 warnings and then a ban - but maybe a 6 month or 1 year ban ? then after coming back after a ban, you get one/no warning for misconduct ? just throwing figures/ideas out.

So, my post is basically nothing to do with historic desicions, including Tim's ruling - but looking to review the "constitution"

Committee/Mods - this is intended to be a constructive post - in no way is it saying that the lifetime ban was a bad rule - just maybe should be reviewed (the ban rule, not decision on Tim) ?

hth
Rob

2nded!

edit: (why didn't i just type seconded??)

[luthor1]

OMG! I am now getting personal e-mails from Tim himself politely asking me if I have a problem with him!!

If I suddenly stop posting, send in the St Bernard with the Whiskey Barrel!!

[ryan]

Jesus!
Please lock this thread, it seems some have nowt better to do than revive this thread and cause trouble/aggro. I can't see it benifiting anyone leaving this open?

[Dale_V]

Sad loss to IMOC , VERY SAD LOSS!

Im sure Tim will continue to do well as his reputation for knowledge/price/availability was good, and hopefully the members of IMOC will remember this when needing MR2 services.... I hope so anyway!

[Lauren]

Jesus!
Please lock this thread, it seems some have nowt better to do than revive this thread and cause trouble/aggro. I can't see it benifiting anyone leaving this open?

Surely if people add 'SENSIBLE' comments in suggestions, then we could all benefit?

[Andy Champ]

LOL! Another "1 post" person dragging up this old thread.

Mysterious indeed

Although it says they joined IMOC nearly 2 years ago - conspiracy nuts eat your heart out....

Never heard of a "lurker"? Someone who reads, and doesn't post? [OK, so none of the rest of us are shy... but...]

Andy

[EdMR2]

OMG! I am now getting personal e-mails from Tim himself politely asking me if I have a problem with him!!

If I suddenly stop posting, send in the St Bernard with the Whiskey Barrel!!

What was the point of that post?

I was with Tim when he emailed you, he emailed you to see if there was a personal problem you had regarding him, and if there was he wanted to know how to make amends.

personally i feel there wasn't anything wrong with this, as hes just trying to get on with anyone and resolve any issues if there has been a misunderstanding.

Why Comment like that?

Ed.