xxxx and IMOC-UK

[paul_h]

just out of interest what is there to stop Tim using the new name to post? or for that matter just creating another me@TB user name and using that?

I don't believe for a second that he wont

paul

[tonigmr2]

Quite.
T

[anna]

All will become clear in the fullness of time

A current snapshot is that Ed@xxxx shouldn't be used as he is not an affiliate. This is in hand.

[ryan]

I suggest Simon aka 'skin the spin' stop $hit stirring, and get over his age old grudge with Tim. Why are you trying to inflame the situation on here?

ToniG, I saw Tim and Ed over the weekend, Tim certainly won't be posting under Ed's username.

[Speedy]

I just think its funny that some people obviously have nothing better to do apart from causing trouble.

it is a strange thing indeed. I would suggest though that no further antagonistic posts are made on here, we will lock it if we have to.

[skinthespin]

I only mentioned it because if he is allowed back on or indeed if he is allowed to trade on here under a different name then I think it makes a bit of a mockery of the whole deal, especially as the time and effort the mods have already put into this (which incidentally I have defended several times), so was wondering what the score is, how is that antagonistic?

I have refrained from saying what I think of Tim on here and only commented on the facts as I see them and stand by the fact that if an affiliate gets 4 formal warnings which then results in a ban his behaviour is woefully inadequate, I dont know how anyone can defend that.

[anna]

I only mentioned it because if he is allowed back on or indeed if he is allowed to trade on here under a different name then I think it makes a bit of a mockery of the whole deal, especially as the time and effort the mods have already put into this (which incidentally I have defended several times), so was wondering what the score is, how is that antagonistic?

I have refrained from saying what I think of Tim on here and only commented on the facts as I see them and stand by the fact that if an affiliate gets 4 formal warnings which then results in a ban his behaviour is woefully inadequate, I dont know how anyone can defend that.

I agree.
All in the fullness of time

[EdMR2]

Simon your not aware of the full details and conditions regarding the warnings or situtation so i think it wise for you not to comment on things that don't concern you.

Ed

[anna]

Simon your not aware of the full details and conditions regarding the warnings or situtation so i think it wise for you not to comment on things that don't concern you.

Ed

I disagree.
Simon is perfectly within his rights to question this. However, I will not divulge any information at this time, and Tim should really not have done so on another forum (it's up to him though, the consequence is posts such as Simon's).

Ryan, I remind you that personal attacks on any member are against the forum rules, and will result in formal warnings.

Any posts requesting further details on the matter will be ignored. Do not expect any information until the issues with xxxx and IMOC have been resolved (whenever that may be)

[tonigmr2]

I only mentioned it because if he is allowed back on or indeed if he is allowed to trade on here under a different name then I think it makes a bit of a mockery of the whole deal, especially as the time and effort the mods have already put into this (which incidentally I have defended several times), so was wondering what the score is, how is that antagonistic?

I have refrained from saying what I think of Tim on here and only commented on the facts as I see them and stand by the fact that if an affiliate gets 4 formal warnings which then results in a ban his behaviour is woefully inadequate, I dont know how anyone can defend that.

Let's face it, on here or not, people who want to deal with him will, and people who don't won't.

T

[luthor1]

Posting on another forum that there may/maynot be a way back onto IMOC *before* the decision is made is, yet again, playing the game. It shows entirely poor taste and a disrespect for the authority of IMOC officials and the rules of IMOC.

I hope there isn't an increase in the sale of brown envelopes this month.

[Speedy]

I hope there isn't an increase in the sale of brown envelopes this month.

glol, nice idea, but no. Like I said way back, we do take the integrity of the forums seriously.

[Leon.]

That went way over my head

And anyone fancy putting a link up to the thread in question?

[greeny]

That went way over my head

And anyone fancy putting a link up to the thread in question?

I guessed at back handers->brown envolopes?

But that is a guess lol

[Tiamat]

Well if there has been then I am still awaiting mine....

For the record: Unless engaged in a professional capacity then no monies will EVER be accepted by me for any decision I make or do not make on this Forum or in connection with the same, if anyone thinks I will risk my job and my career for a few quid then they best think again.

[ryan]

Simon your not aware of the full details and conditions regarding the warnings or situtation so i think it wise for you not to comment on things that don't concern you.

Ed

I disagree.
Simon is perfectly within his rights to question this. However, I will not divulge any information at this time, and Tim should really not have done so on another forum (it's up to him though, the consequence is posts such as Simon's).

Ryan, I remind you that personal attacks on any member are against the forum rules, and will result in formal warnings.

Any posts requesting further details on the matter will be ignored. Do not expect any information until the issues with xxxx and IMOC have been resolved (whenever that may be)

Personla attack asking Simon to stop $hit stirring? Merely a request anna spanner. After all I ain't admin...

[anna]

Tim refering to IMOC:

yeah i had heard mate, not to worry i'll be back on there by the end of the week.

Tim
xxxx

Simons response:

Tim reckons (on another forum) he'll be back here by the end of the week.....

I suggest Simon aka 'skin the spin' stop $hit stirring, and get over his age old grudge with Tim. Why are you trying to inflame the situation on here?

I'd call your reaction pretty harsh and personal for, what looks to me, a statement of fact.

HTH.

[ryan]

Tim refering to IMOC:

yeah i had heard mate, not to worry i'll be back on there by the end of the week.

Tim
xxxx

Simons response:

Tim reckons (on another forum) he'll be back here by the end of the week.....

I suggest Simon aka 'skin the spin' stop $hit stirring, and get over his age old grudge with Tim. Why are you trying to inflame the situation on here?

I'd call your reaction pretty harsh and personal for, what looks to me, a statement of fact.

HTH.

Stirring up trouble and 'carrying tales'. Lets agree to disagree, we're off topic here a bit, and you are admin, so you're right anyway

Roger and out

[skinthespin]

I dont see why im being chastised for just quoting something that Tim himself said, all i'm doing is copying it, he's the guy making huge assumptions and saying those things, I (as I have said) merely pointed this out because of my concerns that this would make a mockery of the admins decision.

I think he needs to learn to play the game (alot) better.

[Jaspa]

Ryan, Skinthespin.

Don't bother replying to each other in this thread anymore, take it to PM if you want to argue the toss.

Stuart