




All the sites and members have their little ways, I agree the OC is more orientated to meets etc.





One thing I do disagree with is







T
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
philz wrote:
In my opinion it seems to me that the OC members enjoy and use their cars whereas it seems that IMOC members just enjoy building the engines but never actually get to use them.
tonigmr2 wrote:once it's finished.![]()
![]()
philz wrote:it seems that IMOC members just enjoy building the engines but never actually get to use them.
Dave Coles wrote:i seem to remeber a while back that the MR2OC had a slightly stroppy notice stating that they had sent invitations to the other MR2 clubs to hold a joint meeting to form an all inclusive club.
Apparently not one of the other clubs responded by the deadline, so the MR2OC was not going to ask again!
did anyone else see this, or did i imagine it?![]()
Aidy wrote:Dave Coles wrote:i seem to remeber a while back that the MR2OC had a slightly stroppy notice stating that they had sent invitations to the other MR2 clubs to hold a joint meeting to form an all inclusive club.
Apparently not one of the other clubs responded by the deadline, so the MR2OC was not going to ask again!
did anyone else see this, or did i imagine it?![]()
It was the MR2DC that did that.
CosmosblueMR2 wrote:I prefer IMOC as it's far easier to use, it appears from it's members to be geared up for more serious tuning![]()
.
.
and the people seem only to post when they have something useful to say,
( i like that as it cuts out a lot of rubbish.
)
Aidy wrote:
On a similar subject notice how the only people interested in TOTB are those whose cars
"should be ready" by then, and almost certainly pull out just before the event?
Aidy wrote:philz wrote:it seems that IMOC members just enjoy building the engines but never actually get to use them.
On a similar subject notice how the only people interested in TOTB are those whose cars
"should be ready" by then, and almost certainly pull out just before the event?
(BTW that seems to apply to all car clubs, not just IMOC!)
tonigmr2 wrote:![]()
![]()
It's because we get let down by suppliers and engine builders who completely have their own timeframe..
.
.
*sigh*
T
Bibbs wrote:
I'm mainly on TOC as we have our own MR2 section.
I basically stopped posting on IMOC as I couldn't handle the several hundred posts a day from IMOC-CHAT.
michael wrote:Bibbs wrote:
I'm mainly on TOC as we have our own MR2 section.
Nice plug
I basically stopped posting on IMOC as I couldn't handle the several hundred posts a day from IMOC-CHAT.
You could have unsubscribed from Chat and remained on IMOC- I seem to remember you leaving because people were laughing at your questionable taste in mods
Aidy wrote:tonigmr2 wrote:![]()
![]()
It's because we get let down by suppliers and engine builders who completely have their own timeframe..
.
.
*sigh*
T
Oh, ok..
.
.I thought it was maybe cos people live in a fantasy land RE their cars.
![]()
![]()
![]()
BTW, on a totally unrelated note when are we finally going to see this twin-charged Mk1 of yours?
![]()
![]()
![]()