


They will rough the bores but thats all- just a de glaze

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
simmo490 wrote:this thread has made my day, and obviousley educated me
xxxx wrote:back onto the hone/glaze busters topic.
![]()
The glaze buster and hand honing tools is pretty much the same tool, the difference is the type of stone used.
The glaze buster stone is very fine and designed to add the crosshatch pattern in the cylinders without removing material for fitment of standard spec pistons.Same idea for a flexable drive honer
(type will the little balls on, lol)
Theprecision honer uses different types of stones, usually a silicone carbide or aluminium oxide type stone with a coolant fluid added to remove
"burnishing" which is, as the stones wear during the hone process the small peaks and ridges created by the honer become clogged.
Although this can be overcome with a more progressive steps in honing stone coarseness.
The engine is usually bored to around 0.004-0.006" of metal remaining to ideal cylinder diameter including piston clearances.For moly based piston rings
(believe standard type) a 280 grit stone is used to reduce the cylinder size to within 0.0015 of the final diameter, the remaining material should be removed with a 400 grit for finishing.
Of course final finishing depends on piston ring combinations used.
This is for race specs, OEM quality usually states around a 280grit final surface for molly based rings where chrome based rings are finalised using up to 220grit as average, Chrome-based pistons rings like the type used in JE and CP require a slightly courser grade of hone.
The crosshatch pattern should ideally be 45 degrees to the horizontal deck surface or 22-32degrees max.This angle should be uniform through out the cylinders.
The reason for this is how the valleys
(scratches) retain oil.
If the angle is to steep the piston rings themselves can remove oil from the scratches creating excess wear due to lack of lubrication.
If the angle is to short there unseating effect on the piston rings as they pass overtop causing improper sealing, poor compression and a lack of lubrication again from incorrect contact to the cylinder wall.
When i said about vaccum i ment vaccum seal of the piston rings against the cylinder walls.If its a vaccum seal there isn't enough lubrication created by the vallys of the crosshatch.
This is where an automatic honer comes in handy as the angle of the crosshatch to the deck surface depends on the speed of the up and down action of the honing machine.With a hand honer this takes some practice to do, but the machine is automatic giving a constant hone pattern and universal through out.
Its the best way to do it but the old tried and tested method of a hand honer is still doable in the correct hands.
The crosshatch finishing coarseness is also important, if there valleys of the crosshatch arent deep enough the valleys wont retain enough oil for correct lubrication,(400grit+) to deep and the engine will use excessive oil leaking to oil being burnt in the combustion chamber
(150grit-).
The smoother the cylinders the better they will seal but once again the less oil in the valleys the less oil retained leading to increased piston ring wear and engine friction heat.
This is why race engines use smoother bores for increased piston-ring to cylinder wall sealing, but unless its intended for endurance ranging the piston wear isnt a concern compared to a road engine designed to run 100,000miles plus.
Hopefully this will shed some more light on the subject, Every time we get into a debate like this I have to break open my engine build notes and resource information to prove Im not talking out my ar$e.Lol
Thanks for reading
Tim
xxxx
The cross hatch helps lubricate the top two rings by holding a thin layer of oil, preventing a vacuum is utter poo.![]()
ok thats fair enough, my point being that you can get a honer/what ever you want to call it fitted into a drill attachment