Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

buddster33

Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by buddster33 »

Dear all,

I read somewhere that the MR2 Turbo is the quickest (0-60mph) 4 cylinder production car in the world. Is this true or are Impreza's or Evo's or anything else quicker when they come out of the factory - before being tuned up in the uk?

Anyone?
prezjamin

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by prezjamin »

Not sure about 4 cylinder, possibly. I know the fastest two production cars 0-60 are the following:

Viper Venom 800 Twin Turbo hits 0-60 in 2.2 seconds.

The Camaro ZL-1 hits 0-60 in 2.3 seconds.
craig
Posts: 43936
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 3:44 am

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by craig »

0-60 = 2.2 seconds

:shock: :shock: :shock:
JohnnyC
Posts: 7001
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:25 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: Is this true?

Post by JohnnyC »

buddster33 wrote:Dear all,

I read somewhere that the MR2 Turbo is the quickest (0-60mph) 4 cylinder production car in the world. Is this true or are Impreza's or Evo's or anything else quicker when they come out of the factory - before being tuned up in the uk?

Anyone?


I think *WAS* is probably right.
prezjamin

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by prezjamin »

RedMR² wrote:0-60 = 2.2 seconds

:shock: :shock: :shock:


I know, i think you have to have a degree of control whilst accellerating. lol
MegatronUK

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by MegatronUK »

If you're talking 4-cylinder only... then:

Caterham Superlight R500
Westfield FW400
Radical SR1

Ariel Atom is probably quicker too, but I'm not sure.

..are all faster. Yep, limited production models, but all road-going cars from the factory, nontheless. There'll be others too.

Oh, and the 4cyl turbo Group B rally cars (of which you could technically buy road going versions) were all sub-5 (a lot are sub 4!) second cars.
senie

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by senie »

sure you could count an evo 8 400 as being quicker, although it is about 10/15 years newer.

in 1990 when rev1 came out it could have been

1994 (rev 3) i would anticipate a top of the range scooby would argue the fact.

What was a lancia delta? All i know was that was super/turbo charged, but cylinders??
Driftlimits Performance
IMOC Affiliated Company
Posts: 4928
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:33 am
Location: 01442 601301
Contact:

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by Driftlimits Performance »

integrale? Thats a turbo yeah, but not as fast as us.
User avatar
Lauren
IMOC Committee
Posts: 38632
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by Lauren »

senie wrote:sure you could count an evo 8 400 as being quicker, although it is about 10/15 years newer.

in 1990 when rev1 came out it could have been

1994 (rev 3) i would anticipate a top of the range scooby would argue the fact.

What was a lancia delta? All i know was that was super/turbo charged, but cylinders??


An Integrale (Inter-graaley) was a 4pot. The first ones had 8 valves, the later one 16 valves. There was also an 'Evolution' model. that would have had similar power to a turbo. All Integrales' were turbocharged.

The Delta S4 way back in the 80s had around 300bhp, that was a four-pot and was turboed and supercharged. Though it was a homologation special.

I think it is untrue that a turbo was the quickest 4 cylinder car when it was released as a Lotus Esprit Turbo SE back in '87 had more power than a turbo and was quicker.

What is interesting is that the MK1 SC automatic was said to be the fastest accelerating production car from 0-30mph in 1986.
Driftlimits Performance
IMOC Affiliated Company
Posts: 4928
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:33 am
Location: 01442 601301
Contact:

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by Driftlimits Performance »

87 esprit was a 4 pot?
User avatar
Lauren
IMOC Committee
Posts: 38632
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by Lauren »

Skywalker wrote:87 esprit was a 4 pot?


Yep 2.2 slant four all alloy with 16v head.

Based on the vauxhall slant four (2.3) as seen in the Firenza, HS Chevette which was originally derived from a GM V8, hence the slant four ie its half a V8.
Driftlimits Performance
IMOC Affiliated Company
Posts: 4928
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:33 am
Location: 01442 601301
Contact:

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by Driftlimits Performance »

ahhhhhh! You learn something new everyday :D

(along with how long the clubs have been around)

So 2 things.
Aidy

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by Aidy »

It certainly isn't the fastest and it never was. My 4 cyl production car does 0-60 in 4.4. Comparing year for year many of the 4WD rally cars of the day were always faster to 60 than the MR2.
Mark Edwards
Posts: 11298
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:27 am
Location: Eastbourne
Contact:

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by Mark Edwards »

I know for a fact that the ford rs500 held the guiness world record for the fastest accelerating car for a number of years. 3.12secs IIRC. 2.2 four pot i believe with 600bhp.
Driftlimits Performance
IMOC Affiliated Company
Posts: 4928
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:33 am
Location: 01442 601301
Contact:

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by Driftlimits Performance »

Did you see when they featured the RS in 'EVO' magazine? What a great article :D
stevecordiner
Posts: 875
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:34 pm
Location: Desk

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by stevecordiner »

I think when the MR2 was released it was the fastest mass produced car 0-60. But you need to take into account that at the time there was the likes of the Evo 1,2,3's etc which were technically quicker 0-60 but only produced in small numbers and didnt fall within mass produced.
Small turbos - they're not big and they're not clever!

Just say NO to small turbos!
buddster33

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by buddster33 »

Hang on a minute.....I meant to say standard cars out of the factory un-modified and not including rally cars or kit type cars where you have the option of a superbike engine! Just regular go down to your dealer and order cars. Anything other than an '87 Lotus Esprit Turbo SE?
JJ
Posts: 3825
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:11 am
Location: Stockton-On-Tees

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by JJ »

How about the powerfullest car to leave japan in 1989/90.. perhaps the fastest ?

Not many around in the late 80s early 90's pumping out 220bhp !! :D

Well the celica got the title back in 86 with the 190bhp GT4 !

Supra turbo rings a bell in 89 kicking out 230 dd bhp ?

hmmm.

MR2's got good brakes !! :lol:
|| S256SX Airwerks Powered MR2 Turbo || V10 BMW M5 ||
Raf
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: close by

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by Raf »

buddster33 wrote: Anything other than an '87 Lotus Esprit Turbo SE?


isnt one enough????
Aidy

Re: Is this true?- MR2 Turbo is quickest 4 cylinder car 0-60?

Post by Aidy »

buddster33 wrote:Hang on a minute.....I meant to say standard cars out of the factory un-modified and not including rally cars


You mean only cars that weren't faster than the MR2? ;) Cars homologated for rally use tend to have 4wd and low ratio gearing making then good 0-60 cars. You could go down to your dealer and buy one and drive it off the forecourt. I think someone made a good point RE massed produced vs production car.
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”