





Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
steve b wrote:looks good![]()
![]()
I'm with you and some others here in thinking the rev1
& 2 lights look best, do indeed make the rear of the car wider and lower looking, got to be a good thing
![]()
RedMR² wrote:
Cheers Shaf![]()
![]()
I have a daylight picture too!
![]()
Hurstie1981 wrote:Craig you have too much money!
Hurstie1981 wrote:Is there 10% off at MTTE?
Leeroy wrote:Craig
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
hmmmmmm, must say I prefer the rev 3 lights- not being biased at all!
I think they just bring up to date a bit more.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
and suit the car better
![]()
![]()
Can't remember your old bumper(was nice though!), could you put up a pic of that to compare with the new one?!
One thing I really don't like is the'thing' in between the rear light clusters
![]()
![]()
Sorry!!!!Side skirts are cool though, and front spoiler!!
![]()
mr2nut123 wrote:now thats nice.yeah rev1 spoiler n lights are best i rekon
Leeroy wrote:Bumper is an improvement although not much diff from before?!Guess you had to keep with the same type of kit.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Spoiler is def better, not really a fan of the old one![]()
![]()
Good job!
D33 wrote:Rev3 lights are better but the old style seems to suit your car just as good.I quite like the old ones on yours
vindezal wrote:
your car does look nice and chunky now so thumbs up! for what you have done to a rev1/2??![]()
RedMR² wrote:Replaced my rev 3 lights with rev 1's
RedMR² wrote:Replaced my rev 3 lights with rev 1's and wired them up as imports(4 brake
+ tail)