How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

Rory
Posts: 2969
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:03 pm
Location: Herts

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by Rory »

jimGTS wrote:
Rory wrote:
jimGTS wrote:will this BOV affect my performance???
or will it only effect my mpg????

what mechanical disadvantages does the hks ssqv cause???
i dont want this thing to cause my engine or turbo to die before it needs to.


The BOV will give you no extra power full stop. The only thing it will give you for sure is a loud whoosh between gears. It may also effect your fueling if you have a rev 1 or 2 tubby. Id spend your money on something usefull and not chavish!

Rory



oh i know it doesnt increase performance, but i thought it might do the reverse???
what about getting an apexi induction kit instead?


Thats what I would do! I got rid of my SSQ BOV because im sure my car wasnt running as fast (could have been in my head though). Im sure my car ran much better with the stock BOV back on. If you want a real power gain get a FCD and grainger valve fitted! I noticed it on your future mods list.

Rory
Clarky
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Ashford Kent

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by Clarky »

Hello jim, thought id put my 2p in, had a Blitz dvalve on my rev 2 sound very loud and once got used to it loved it! (it came with the car) Initially had trouble with stalling but seemed to sort it with proper fuel and ecu reset.

However it causes probs on rev 2 like chucking fuel out giving you the occasional bang through exhaust and the thing i didnt like most of all which is hard to explain but when you came off the throttle at higher speeds it feels like the the engine shuts down giving you hard engine braking instead of gently drifting off, (as i said hard to explain) try this at 130-140mph feels Very Dodgy especially if going round slight bend.

As i mostly did shortish journeys round town A roads etc wasnt to much of a pain but if going for speed i would think again. If you hav the money to try it go for it you can always stick original back on.

Still loved the noise :wink:
DannyW
Posts: 2060
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by DannyW »

Ive had my HKS SSQV on for a month or so and ive not had a single stalling or running problem. and also i keep a strict eye on fuel consumption as my car is a daily driver and i can tell you that it has not been affected at all. the car drives exactly the same as before except now i have the "chavish" sound to go with it.
jimGTS
Posts: 14024
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: North Kent

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by jimGTS »

DannyW wrote:Ive had my HKS SSQV on for a month or so and ive not had a single stalling or running problem. and also i keep a strict eye on fuel consumption as my car is a daily driver and i can tell you that it has not been affected at all. the car drives exactly the same as before except now i have the "chavish" sound to go with it.




jesus!

i hear one thing then the other, lol!!
gona go crazy!

gona have to way up the pros and cons here, and make up me mind!
DannyW
Posts: 2060
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by DannyW »

jimGTS wrote:
DannyW wrote:Ive had my HKS SSQV on for a month or so and ive not had a single stalling or running problem. and also i keep a strict eye on fuel consumption as my car is a daily driver and i can tell you that it has not been affected at all. the car drives exactly the same as before except now i have the "chavish" sound to go with it.




jesus!

i hear one thing then the other, lol!!
gona go crazy!

gona have to way up the pros and cons here, and make up me mind!



I can only tell you my own experience James. make of it what you will but my opinion is Go for it!
Mark Edwards
Posts: 11298
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:27 am
Location: Eastbourne
Contact:

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by Mark Edwards »

I've got one on my rev1. If i had it venting it would hesitate a bit between gear changes, i then had it recirculating and all was fine again. Unless you go for an aftermarket ecu so you can remove the afm then honestly i wouldn't do it, stick with the stock one and forget the noise. Now the motec is on, i'm venting again. :D
Paul R
Posts: 1341
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Nantwich

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by Paul R »

DannyW wrote:
jimGTS wrote:
DannyW wrote:Ive had my HKS SSQV on for a month or so and ive not had a single stalling or running problem. and also i keep a strict eye on fuel consumption as my car is a daily driver and i can tell you that it has not been affected at all. the car drives exactly the same as before except now i have the "chavish" sound to go with it.




jesus!

i hear one thing then the other, lol!!
gona go crazy!

gona have to way up the pros and cons here, and make up me mind!



I can only tell you my own experience James. make of it what you will but my opinion is Go for it!


You have had no problems because you have a rev3.

Rev1/2 is a different story.

Paul.
DannyW
Posts: 2060
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by DannyW »

Nope mine is a rev1 engine mate.
Paul R
Posts: 1341
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Nantwich

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by Paul R »

jimGTS wrote:
DannyW wrote:Ive had my HKS SSQV on for a month or so and ive not had a single stalling or running problem. and also i keep a strict eye on fuel consumption as my car is a daily driver and i can tell you that it has not been affected at all. the car drives exactly the same as before except now i have the "chavish" sound to go with it.




jesus!

i hear one thing then the other, lol!!
gona go crazy!

gona have to way up the pros and cons here, and make up me mind!


DannyW has a rev3 mate.....yours is a rev2 yes? This problem only affects rev1/2's!

Paul.
Paul R
Posts: 1341
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Nantwich

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by Paul R »

jimGTS wrote:
DannyW wrote:Ive had my HKS SSQV on for a month or so and ive not had a single stalling or running problem. and also i keep a strict eye on fuel consumption as my car is a daily driver and i can tell you that it has not been affected at all. the car drives exactly the same as before except now i have the "chavish" sound to go with it.




jesus!

i hear one thing then the other, lol!!
gona go crazy!

gona have to way up the pros and cons here, and make up me mind!


DannyW has a rev3 mate.....yours is a rev2 yes? This problem only affects rev1/2's!

Paul.
DannyW
Posts: 2060
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by DannyW »

Paul R wrote:
jimGTS wrote:
DannyW wrote:Ive had my HKS SSQV on for a month or so and ive not had a single stalling or running problem. and also i keep a strict eye on fuel consumption as my car is a daily driver and i can tell you that it has not been affected at all. the car drives exactly the same as before except now i have the "chavish" sound to go with it.




jesus!

i hear one thing then the other, lol!!
gona go crazy!

gona have to way up the pros and cons here, and make up me mind!


DannyW has a rev3 mate.....yours is a rev2 yes? This problem only affects rev1/2's!

Paul.



Paul mine's a rev1 engine
Paul R
Posts: 1341
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Nantwich

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by Paul R »

DannyW wrote:Nope mine is a rev1 engine mate.


OK, must be something different abouts yours then. Just curious, but why a rev1 engine in a rev3 car?

Paul.
craig
Posts: 43936
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 3:44 am

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by craig »

DannyW wrote:Ive had my HKS SSQV on for a month or so and ive not had a single stalling or running problem. and also i keep a strict eye on fuel consumption as my car is a daily driver and i can tell you that it has not been affected at all. the car drives exactly the same as before except now i have the "chavish" sound to go with it.


Seconded although I have the Blitz SS and no probs with stalling, petrol comsumption increase etc. Car runs fine and the same with re-circ :wink:
craig
Posts: 43936
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 3:44 am

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by craig »

Paul R wrote:
DannyW wrote:Nope mine is a rev1 engine mate.


OK, must be something different abouts yours then. Just curious, but why a rev1 engine in a rev3 car?

Paul.


Dude, Danny has a rev 1 engine and has a rev 2 car :roll:

:lol: :lol:
Paul R
Posts: 1341
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Nantwich

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by Paul R »

RedMR² wrote:
Paul R wrote:
DannyW wrote:Nope mine is a rev1 engine mate.


OK, must be something different abouts yours then. Just curious, but why a rev1 engine in a rev3 car?

Paul.


Dude, Danny has a rev 1 engine and has a rev 2 car :roll:

:lol: :lol:


Sorry, I should pay more attention. I had a look at his pic, saw it was a 1993, looked like a late one...so thought rev3 ;)

Either case....did he do a transplant or something?

I'm surprised you havent noticed any problems......

Paul.
craig
Posts: 43936
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 3:44 am

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by craig »

Paul R wrote:
RedMR² wrote:
Paul R wrote:

OK, must be something different abouts yours then. Just curious, but why a rev1 engine in a rev3 car?

Paul.


Dude, Danny has a rev 1 engine and has a rev 2 car :roll:

:lol: :lol:


Sorry, I should pay more attention. I had a look at his pic, saw it was a 1993, looked like a late one...so thought rev3 ;)

Either case....did he do a transplant or something?

I'm surprised you havent noticed any problems......

Paul.


yeah mate, Danny's was a rev 2 N/A. Transplant by Rogue Systems.

Some rev 1/2 cars are fine with dump to atmos bovs, some aren't.

My car drives exactly the same as it did when I had the recirc on :wink:
Paul R
Posts: 1341
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Nantwich

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by Paul R »

Yeah, it is strange..

Did he have his car dynoed after the transplant and with the BOV? Did that not show up any overfueling??

Paul.
DannyW
Posts: 2060
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by DannyW »

my car looks a bit like a rev3 as ive colour coded the side strips and front lip. don't know why i havent had any problems with the BOV but it's running fine so i'm happy. i have heard of problems with single piston dump valves on rev1/2 cars but the twin piston type like the blitz and HKS SSQV seem to be ok.
Paul R
Posts: 1341
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Nantwich

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by Paul R »

DannyW wrote:my car looks a bit like a rev3 as ive colour coded the side strips and front lip. don't know why i havent had any problems with the BOV but it's running fine so i'm happy. i have heard of problems with single piston dump valves on rev1/2 cars but the twin piston type like the blitz and HKS SSQV seem to be ok.


I cant see how a single/twin piston valve would make any difference? The key thing is that if it dumps to atmos, the AFM cant be getting the correct reading on lift-off....

We could do with an expert on Toyota's ECU's on the board!! Cant the admin fly one over from Japan for a QA session?? :D

Paul.
craig
Posts: 43936
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 3:44 am

Re: How good is the HKS SSQV???? (rev2)

Post by craig »

Paul R wrote:
DannyW wrote:my car looks a bit like a rev3 as ive colour coded the side strips and front lip. don't know why i havent had any problems with the BOV but it's running fine so i'm happy. i have heard of problems with single piston dump valves on rev1/2 cars but the twin piston type like the blitz and HKS SSQV seem to be ok.


I cant see how a single/twin piston valve would make any difference? The key thing is that if it dumps to atmos, the AFM cant be getting the correct reading on lift-off....

We could do with an expert on Toyota's ECU's on the board!! Cant the admin fly one over from Japan for a QA session?? :D

Paul.


The twin piston types are closed on idle. The Blitz gen 2 I have is designed with AFM cars in mind. Dual drive, Dual piston

Mine runs rich under load and lean when off the pedal.....normal :wink:
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”