
a) Veilside bumper looked xxxx and made my Nur Spec look


b) I reckon that the Autopista spoiler is too angular for the kit I have so here is a pic of my car now:





Thanks to Dale for comin round and helpin us out!




Cheers,

Craig
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Mikejc wrote:The Nur still looks to be sitting alot lower than my own![]()
![]()
Mikejc
Rowland_W wrote:Hmm..
.
.there was something about that Veilside copy rear bumper that didn't quite look right.
Better now though![]()
Rowland_W wrote:Hmm..
.
.there was something about that Veilside copy rear bumper that didn't quite look right.
Better now though![]()
Hedgehog Dodger wrote:Rowland_W wrote:Hmm..
.
.there was something about that Veilside copy rear bumper that didn't quite look right.
Better now though![]()
Row mate, you have the veilside on yours dont you, it looked to sit lower than Craigs.![]()
I have to say your car looked really nice today without a spoiler
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And those wheels.
.
.
.
.what a bargain!
![]()
![]()
Did you find that wheel stopper thingy thing?
Craig, you know what I am going to say![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Looks top quality now
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Why not get a Toms rear spoiler
![]()
shafster wrote:i think it looks a lot better now mate.![]()
you are right about the veilside rear bumper, it looked a bit odd with the nur.i personally think the bumper wasnt a good copy.
the spoiler also looks better than the straight lines of the autopista one.
well done
Gareth Hill wrote:craig, i agree with the rear spoiler its too square! you need a veilside or erubuni one.
dont agree with the rear bumper though it looks great! get the side vents smoothed in itl look even better
!
exhausts fine use some auto glymn instant tar remover every wash and itl shine!!
gaz