
http://www.performanceunlimited.co.uk/
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
androo007 wrote:Happy with that- I just can't find 8.5:1 pistons!
ashley wrote:When I was after Carrillo rods Jon was very helpful, Cambridge Motorsport Parts.
http://www.cambridgemotorsport.com/#_
[email protected]
androo007 wrote:
Thanks for all teh help guys..
.
daunting to get it wrong!
Also, i was looking at using a Toyota HG- any reason i should use another?
(HKS, Apexi etc?) If there isnt a significant reason i'll just stick with Toyboata
androo007 wrote:Hi Rich,
Aha, super thanks.just gave them a call,
£534 delivered.
Will see if I can get lower than that.
I asked the CR and why they are 9.0:1 and not stock 8.5:1.
.
.
he just answered that octane of fuel is higher than it was in the 90's and compression is rising in general now
![]()
not the best answer eh?
androo007 wrote:I guess- but i'll be using the stock ECU for fuel management too.
One thought occurred to me last night- typically i'll end up in a year or two wanting to upgrade the blower.
Assuming i want 400bhp, will just forged pistons
& engine work be enough? I'm not looking to spend cash unless needed.
.
.
.
.
Good news on the Toyota HG.
Compression wise, i'd much rather keep it safe..
.
.
.
i dont care about off boost power so if its safer to run lower compression I'm there
![]()
androo007 wrote:Hi Rich,
Aha, super thanks.just gave them a call,
£534 delivered.
Will see if I can get lower than that.
I asked the CR and why they are 9.0:1 and not stock 8.5:1.
.
.
he just answered that octane of fuel is higher than it was in the 90's and compression is rising in general now
![]()
not the best answer eh?
Odin_S wrote:Forgive my limited knowledge but Toyota'sCP is only considered
"really" safe at standard boost levels i.e.
13 psi/0.9 bar.
![]()
We get away with it at 1.2bar to a point on the standard turbo and ecu.![]()
However putting a bigger turbo(bigger air maker) and keeping the CR around the same,
isn't the possibility for detonation bigger than if the CR was lower?
Advances in fuel have been made but physics is still the same.![]()
Feel free to shot me down![]()
Odin_S wrote:Relying on the better fuel we have seems penny wise pound foolish to me.
I would putting as many fail-safes as i could to protect against my engine blowing up.Thats why i went with lower CR.
Anyway its good to get different perspectives on reaching a goal
sheppy wrote:Odin_S wrote:Relying on the better fuel we have seems penny wise pound foolish to me.
I would putting as many fail-safes as i could to protect against my engine blowing up.Thats why i went with lower CR.
Anyway its good to get different perspectives on reaching a goal
That's almost like saying you don't fully belive it's petrol you're putting in the car! Could be orange juice in the tanks at the petrol station
androo007 wrote:It's a mr2 specialist doing the build- done a few so I trust what he said on that side.
.
.
.
I just don't want to end up getting the smaller ones then have the ballache of swapping later on.
Looked at getting another engine buy the costs are astronomical for shipping, buying etc and it's spare cash I can't sneak out.Plus it's a second car so doesn't matter if it's at the workshop for a month or two
![]()
androo007 wrote:ohh really? Interesting..
.
.
.
.
.
.
![]()
![]()