



Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
v1xz wrote:thats if i had it mot'd myself..
.
previous owner didnt supply it.
Peter Gidden - SBITS wrote:v1xz wrote:Ball joints and stabilizer arms recently changed, which is what it failed its MOT on
Since you've done the work you're better off getting a test on it.![]()
Easier to sell with a test.
ashley wrote:GLWS
killa_uk wrote:why dont you break it am sure you will make more then 430 for it?
.
.the only thing I can promise for sure is slow progress.
just have this niggling thought that if I rip out the wiring, then the car will never get out of the garage again.![]()
Shmed wrote:killa_uk wrote:why dont you break it am sure you will make more then 430 for it?
Not in my experience you won't..
.
.
![]()
.
.the only thing I can promise for sure is slow progress.
just have this niggling thought that if I rip out the wiring, then the car will never get out of the garage again.![]()
Shmed wrote:Maybe I'm too soft on my prices..
.
I only paid£275
(plus transportation costs) for the car I'm breaking and I'm struggling to break even on that
The doors and lights were no good though, and I can't be bothered to take the engine out for the sake of£50.
.
.
.
The early rev NA's aren't that desirable as parts
(IMHO).
v1xz wrote:![]()
Now with 12mnths MOT
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
17:06- 07/11/2013
I drove the car back with a fresh 12mnth MOT.it.
.
.