
In your opinion how are they different to drive?

Which did you prefere?

I have a mate looking at MR2 Turbos and GT4's.



Cheers
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
RyanRs wrote:come to think of it, im pretty sure the benchmark specs show that the mr2 is faster on the 1/4 and 0-62 than the GT4.
Dale_V wrote:Boring cars, it just felt so dull.
Slarty wrote:
Dale_V wrote:Boring cars, it just felt so dull.
That's fair enough, each to their own and all that, however I think that some of it is due to the unassuming nature of the car.There's no fuss, no drama.
You can plod along at very high speeds and the car just feels planted and unfussed.
Slarty wrote:RyanRs wrote:come to think of it, im pretty sure the benchmark specs show that the mr2 is faster on the 1/4 and 0-62 than the GT4.
In the dry, yes.When it's wet? Or when the roads are damp? Bye bye.
willfinch36 wrote:Who cares if it goes faster around corners..
.
.
.
going fast around corners is only gonna end up in tears in the long run.
Mr2 is only my weekend toy/sunny days so doesnt really bother me if It doesnt have 4x4 dear oh dear.
easty-5 wrote:willfinch36 wrote:Who cares if it goes faster around corners..
.
.
.
going fast around corners is only gonna end up in tears in the long run.
Mr2 is only my weekend toy/sunny days so doesnt really bother me if It doesnt have 4x4 dear oh dear.
Seriously Will.You just shouldn't post on car forums, your an idiot.
willfinch36 wrote:
Oh yeah, didn't you bin yours into the back of a learner driver in the wet.
its not but just feels a lot safer than the mr2..
![]()