GReddy T67 info please

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

stevecordiner
Posts: 875
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:34 pm
Location: Desk

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by stevecordiner »

Ahaa .. makes sense! Lets just hope Dan finds a car that would suit your needs :D
Small turbos - they're not big and they're not clever!

Just say NO to small turbos!
JJ
Posts: 3825
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:11 am
Location: Stockton-On-Tees

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by JJ »

It doesn't really appeal to be honest


You do right to be honest !! Michels scared of the t-78 which defeats the object of having it put on.... its nothing then everything... then when the everything comes through, your butts nipping because its either breaking traction or on the edge of breaking traction @ 80/90 :shock: not everyones cuppa tea. I've already been a bad influence and told him to get his butt to elvington at the end of the month. Should be interesting. :)
|| S256SX Airwerks Powered MR2 Turbo || V10 BMW M5 ||
Hedgehog Dodger
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 4:55 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by Hedgehog Dodger »

ENSMR2 wrote:
Hedgehog Dodger wrote:
Glad your not in a hurry as I need to check my finances first, and also need to find a suitable replacement.

Good Good me too :( Does the screamer pipe do just that? MScream? No benefits from it?.


Yeah basically. Great Noise though :twisted:

ENSMR2 wrote:
Hedgehog Dodger wrote:
Beleive it or not, a T78 with a 2.2L will produce about 650HP @ 1.5 bar...obviously with 1000CC INJ and a nasty fuel pump and a boot mounted IC IMO :)

I really dont wanna go big a55 turbo. I'll be using mine on the roads not at drag strips.


A TD06 series will be big enough for you needs then. Paul Hornsey has got this on hit Tubby. Very quick spool up time, about 3200 full boost IIRC

ENSMR2 wrote:
Hedgehog Dodger wrote:
The 3037s has good spool times if your revving at say 4500+....but in 4th at 60mph @ 3500(ish) revs when you plant your foot down there is some lag. Its still driveable though...but only just.

:D


By the way I am trying to learn how an external wastegate works. How stuff works site doesnt go into it. Can some one explain with the aid of pics if possible. I'd like to see how it all looks together etc.


It works the same was as a Bleed Valve......once a certain PSI is reached....Wastegate Valve opens and exhaust gasses and dumped out :D In basic terms. One of the big boys can explain better....and when I say big I mean big Brains!

:wink:
SFLee
Posts: 1152
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:29 am

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by SFLee »

while we on the subject of T-67, what psi do you think to run on stock rev3 is safe ?? or not safe at all , with st205cc
ENSMR2
Posts: 12008
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:35 am

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by ENSMR2 »

Hedgehog Dodger wrote:

ENSMR2 wrote:
Hedgehog Dodger wrote:
Beleive it or not, a T78 with a 2.2L will produce about 650HP @ 1.5 bar...obviously with 1000CC INJ and a nasty fuel pump and a boot mounted IC IMO :)

I really dont wanna go big a55 turbo. I'll be using mine on the roads not at drag strips.


A TD06 series will be big enough for you needs then. Paul Hornsey has got this on hit Tubby. Very quick spool up time, about 3200 full boost IIRC


Edit: It'd help if I actually typed something before I submitted!!

The only prob with looking at turbo info is that various sites have different power outputs for the same turbo. Ive just seen that a T67 can handle 550bhp?!? (Chart that michael put up on page 1 of this thread) :? A 3037 does 430approx and on another site 500+ :? I suppose its fly and wheel hp in that case?

The TD06 is lower than the 3037 in terms of power. Spool up time may be quicker though. Then there is always the GT3040 for around £100 more. Then £30 more than that and there is the 3540!!!!

Dan if you wouldnt mind, what you say to giving me a spin in your beast one day? I may be up in Birmingham in the next month or so. Its not that much further for me to travel.

N
Hedgehog Dodger
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 4:55 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by Hedgehog Dodger »

ENSMR2 wrote:
Dan if you wouldnt mind, what you say to giving me a spin in your beast one day? I may be up in Birmingham in the next month or so. Its not that much further for me to travel.

N


Are you doing the Rolling Road in March? Mine will be there, Paul Hornsey's will be there. Good chance to maybe have a test drive in the motor :D
michael
Posts: 6940
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:34 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by michael »

ENSMR2 wrote: Ive just seen that a T67 can handle 550bhp?!? (Chart that michael put up on page 1 of this thread) :? A 3037 does 430approx and on another site 500+ :? I suppose its fly and wheel hp in that case?


That little picture isn't based on the MR2 figures, I have no idea what engine data it uses - it's just a rough guide to give you an idea which turbos have more potential than others.
ENSMR2
Posts: 12008
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:35 am

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by ENSMR2 »

Hedgehog Dodger wrote:
ENSMR2 wrote:
Dan if you wouldnt mind, what you say to giving me a spin in your beast one day? I may be up in Birmingham in the next month or so. Its not that much further for me to travel.

N


Are you doing the Rolling Road in March? Mine will be there, Paul Hornsey's will be there. Good chance to maybe have a test drive in the motor :D


No, My 2 will still be off the road for then. I dont expect it back on the road until late this year or early next year :cry:

Where is the RR being held? I might be able to pop down/arange my trip to birmingham for then.
Hedgehog Dodger
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 4:55 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by Hedgehog Dodger »

ENSMR2 wrote:
No, My 2 will still be off the road for then. I dont expect it back on the road until late this year or early next year :cry:

Where is the RR being held? I might be able to pop down/arange my trip to birmingham for then.


Rolling Road

Its 26th March. Arrange for then and we can see what happend :D
ENSMR2
Posts: 12008
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:35 am

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by ENSMR2 »

Cheers I'll do that. I'll be in the missus 1.2 clio! So you guys better watch out :lol: lol
ENSMR2
Posts: 12008
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:35 am

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by ENSMR2 »

Just had a look at the fensport site. Their corrolla's dyno graph is on there. Im not too impressed with it really. Ok torque is pretty high at 400 lbs but theres no real great incline in the graph. Thats on a GT3035 ball bearing turbo.

Its pushing 535bhp thats about 450 at the wheels not factoring transmission losses!! Its pretty poor compared to what I would have expected. Im guessing weight wont effect torque on a rolling road will it? Just wondering if a 2 with the same mods would get the same readout or if weight is a factor on a rolling road. Im guessing not.

http://www.fensport.co.uk/fensportcars.htm

stevecordiner wrote:

If you want to run pump fuel, realistically your looking at a bit bigger turbo again - or atleast a larger AR on the turbine side to flow a bit more air out. Question is, do you want to make 500rwhp at say 1.7 bar at 7500rpm or at 2 bar at 8k rpms. Up to you really.


Steve: Just like I forget about the nitrous I forget about this. I really want a high torque figure. preferably as low as poss although not neccesarily possible. Put it this way I went from wanting 450 at the fly to over 450 at the rear wheels! I've got used to the idea that 300+ lbs of torque is prob gonna be impossible before 4k!!!! I want a car thats gonna pull like a mofo. Ok so rwhp required is as close to 500 as poss. I want really high torque that pulls from as low down as possible and I'd like to see that plot on the graph for the torque climb up as if is a space shuttle taking off!!! Straight up!!....ok maybe not that great an incline but you get what I mean. The lower down in the rev range the peaks of boost, power and torque the better.
JJ
Posts: 3825
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:11 am
Location: Stockton-On-Tees

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by JJ »

"Its pretty poor compared to what I would have expected."

lol !! It pulls 10's to the qrt doesn't it ?????? thats like 0-135mph in 10 seconds... is that poor !! crikey... you need to buy a bike for the thrills your expecting ! :shock:
|| S256SX Airwerks Powered MR2 Turbo || V10 BMW M5 ||
Hedgehog Dodger
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 4:55 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by Hedgehog Dodger »

ENSMR2 wrote:

Its pushing 535bhp thats about 450 at the wheels not factoring transmission losses!! Its pretty poor compared to what I would have expected. Im guessing weight wont effect torque on a rolling road will it? Just wondering if a 2 with the same mods would get the same readout or if weight is a factor on a rolling road. Im guessing not.


WHAT!!!!! 450 @ the wheels in a 4WD car is pretty poor. Come one fella.........I would love 450HP at the wheels in my car!!!!!

:D
ENSMR2
Posts: 12008
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:35 am

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by ENSMR2 »

JJ wrote:"Its pretty poor compared to what I would have expected."

lol !! It pulls 10's to the qrt doesn't it ?????? thats like 0-135mph in 10 seconds... is that poor !! crikey... you need to buy a bike for the thrills your expecting ! :shock:


WHAT!!!!! 450 @ the wheels in a 4WD car is pretty poor. Come one fella.........I would love 450HP at the wheels in my car!!!!!


HAHA No you guys have your sights set too low. lol only joking.

What I meant was I just expected higher torque and also a steeper plot on the dyno graph. I mean at 5k the cars hitting 225 lbs approx. Thats pretty low for that high in the rev range. I understand its probably turbo lag issues I was just shocked at how low it was.

By the way how big is a T78? and is it ball bearing?
Lee @ 3S Service Centre
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:38 pm
Location: around

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by Lee @ 3S Service Centre »

ENSMR2 wrote:By the way how big is a T78? and is it ball bearing?


BIG and no :P

easy 600bhp I reckon
stevecordiner
Posts: 875
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:34 pm
Location: Desk

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by stevecordiner »

I've got a video of a 2 liter MR2 running 100 shot of nitrous and a T78 at 2 bar on the dyno. It really takes off around 4700-5000rpm and screams to the redline. I'd say you need atleast a 8k rev limit with a T78.

Can be downloaded from here http://www.boostaddict.com/forum/viewto ... 45ada7cd28

It partly depends on which T78 turbine housing you're using, there are different options I think.
Small turbos - they're not big and they're not clever!

Just say NO to small turbos!
ENSMR2
Posts: 12008
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:35 am

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by ENSMR2 »

hmmm well the nos probably bought down the lag by quite a bit. Its also become an option for me. But I dont know how I get traction down on that. I may have to humble my self.
stevecordiner
Posts: 875
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:34 pm
Location: Desk

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by stevecordiner »

How about something like Andy F's turbo? He's making 408 at the hubs at 1.6 bar - so crank it to 1.8 and it'll be around 450, then add on a 50 shot when you want it. His wasn't really laggy and it had a hell of a whollop in the torque curve! :D
Small turbos - they're not big and they're not clever!

Just say NO to small turbos!
ENSMR2
Posts: 12008
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:35 am

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by ENSMR2 »

What has he again?

Yeah but can it hold 1.8 bar? ideally 2 bar would be awesome. Like I said I want as close to 500 at the wheels pre nos.

I'll check out his dyno graph again.
ENSMR2
Posts: 12008
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:35 am

Re: GReddy T67 info please

Post by ENSMR2 »

Just had a look. Very nice torque incline on the dyno graph.

I want more. more I tell ya.

Give me a guestimate on how much a 2.2 would improve things. ( peak torque wise)

Man I must be starting to get annoying. Sorry :wink:
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”