

Anyone actually been through this??

Mike
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
JohnnyC wrote:A mk2 rev 1 or 2 NA would murder even the manual mk3, I'd have thought, there's nearly a whole second difference up to 60mph, so can't imaging the mk3 being able to make up the difference after that![]()
GSB wrote:JohnnyC wrote:A mk2 rev 1 or 2 NA would murder even the manual mk3, I'd have thought, there's nearly a whole second difference up to 60mph, so can't imaging the mk3 being able to make up the difference after that![]()
No chance..
.
A mk3 is definitely quicker off the line than a naturally aspirated mk2.
Its the turbo ones I'm scared of.
.
.
Imcicentally, what 0-60 time are you using?
JohnnyC wrote:
Manual mk2 rev1/2 NA is 7.2 seconds.
Manual mk3 roadster is 8 seconds.
GSB wrote:JohnnyC wrote:
Manual mk2 rev1/2 NA is 7.2 seconds.
Manual mk3 roadster is 8 seconds.
That explains it..
.
![]()
My grandma could do an 8 second 0-60 in my mk3.
.
.
![]()
Evo magazine tested a mk3 at 7.2 seconds.
Others road testers have achieved similar numbers and some cars have achieved high 6's without to much difficulty.
.
.
BenF wrote:from a rolling start a Mk1 NA and a Mk3 NA