Interesting thread.

.

.

.

!

I must firstly say to ClarkyX.

.

.

.I only removed my fans cos they were really rusty

(twin fans, I must add: UK car, no aircon).

It suited me fine running with no fans, but as Steve said, short journeys predominantly, very few hot days in the last few years.

And, when Steve bought the car,

I was under the inpression he was going to track it regularly and was commuting daily.

Based on this, it never crossed my mind to mention the fans were removed: I was aware other people were running fanless, and using the car under similar conditions.

.

.

?

Benefit of hindsight, I may have misjudged things a little: I got away with it.

.

.

.lesson learned!

To Steve H: the side mounted fan would be good on track.

.

.but you would then defo need a fan of some sorts.

The main reason the Mk1 cooling system is SO efficient is the large volume of coolant in the system: putting the rad in the back removes the benefit of this, and makes the coolant system

"average" rather than

"over-engineered".

.

.

.

.

.

.so you'll ned a fan!

Comment on something from page 1 or 2:

F1 cars have no fans.

.

.

.so when they are sitting on the grid, they can easily overheat.

.

.there are guys with battery-powered fans blowing air over the radiators when they are stationary

(and when regs allow!

)

I have just fitted a new alloy rad to my Mk3 V6 conversion: this rad is REALLY efficient

(Paul will confirm this!).

.

.

.

.

But, I will not be removing the OEM fan(s?) from my car this time: the shrouding is in A1 condition, so no reason to remove anything.

.

.

Leaving a car idling for 3 hours intentionally is a little unrealistic, surely?

.

.

.Especially with the price of petrol these days.

.

!?

I would not recommend anyone removing the rad fans just for the sake of it.

.

.

.based on this debate, surely it just creates another thing to worry about.

.

.

.

.

.

?
