I'm having a V6 put in by Woodsport as we speak.

.

.

.

.

!

There are a couple of v6's knocking around already, and Rogue did a 3SGTE a while back.

.

.

.

.

.

.

I reckon the AE101 SC engine from my Mk1 would be really nice in a Mk3.

.

.

?

I think its the general opinion that the 1ZZ Mr.T opted to fit to it was possibly the worst one of the

(then) current bunch.

.

?

They could have gone 4AGZE, 3SGTE, 3S

"beams", 2ZZ, etc, etc.

.

.

.

.

.

Anyway, IMHO the 200hp that the V6 will give should go a long way to making the car what it should have been when it was launched.

.

.

.

.

.

?

Unless you want a 10 sec 1/4 mile car, then there is a limit to the power actually NEEDED: after all, one of the main benefits of the MR2 is its handling

/ balance, etc.

.

.

.

.

I would suggest that anything over 300hp would seriously compromise the traction and handling of the car, unless, of couse, you spend

£££££££ on suspension

/ brake mods.

.

.

.

?

I dunno.

.

.

.

.

.

.it remains to be seen, I suppose?
One things for sure: over the next few years there will be some very interesting engines fitted to the Mk3, with a wide range of results.

.

.

.

Personally, I'm happy to live with the 200 horses.

.

.

.for a while, at least, anyway.

.

.

!

My next avenue will defo be standalone ECU and supercharging.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The 1MZ should handle 4-5 psi before it starts breaking up? Fitting stronger rods

/ forged pistons will minimise the risk of destruction, but then you're on the

£££££ route.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

?

Bang for buck, the 3SGTE has to be the thinking man's option, though.

.

.

.

.

.

.
