![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Craig
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
simmo490 wrote:yeh it did have climate control i had an extra button called e con i think lol
mattcambs wrote:IMO, there's no point setting your sights on a GT at the expense of letting a decent GTS go by.
Spittinflames wrote:Dont you think we should have a sticky regarding the differences between the GT and GT-S.![]()
This question gets asked rather alot.
mattcambs wrote:The ONLY guaranteed differences are:
GT has half leather, steering fogs and electric folding wing mirrors.
The GT isn't more luxury apart from the above.And I don't think they're heavier.
T-bar cars are heavier than tin-tops, though.
All cars have the same air-con/climate control.
Not even all GTs have the premium sound system.IMO, there's no point setting your sights on a GT at the expense of letting a decent GTS go by.
The main choice for most people seems to be colour and T-bar/tin-top.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Steve-O 2007 wrote:ahhh so thats what the Econ is(Climate control).
I thought it was an Economy Air Con mode that didnt use as much fuel lol
![]()
![]()
jimGTS wrote:
+1
![]()
![]()
there is literally no point going for a GT imo over a GTS..
.they all basically came with the same equipment.
when i wanted a bit of luxury, i got uk FULL leather seats and door cards..
.
.no GT comes with those
![]()
![]()