tyres

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

simpson_eh
Posts: 633
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:27 pm
Location: south wales

tyres

Post by simpson_eh »

need to replace all 4 tyres on my 2, at the mo i have rainsport2 on them, are these any good
http://www.camskill.co.uk/m62b0s300p109 ... se%3A_68dB

wet grip a as its always bloody raining in wales lol
Marf
Posts: 6728
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: tyres

Post by Marf »

efficient grip

lol

Unless technology has moved into an area I'm unfamiliar with tyres trade off grip for efficiency, i.e. by reducing the rolling friction you reduce fuel consumption, this is at the expense of grip(i.e. friction)
simpson_eh
Posts: 633
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:27 pm
Location: south wales

Re: tyres

Post by simpson_eh »

As in they say a rated in wet but are they any good
Marf
Posts: 6728
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: tyres

Post by Marf »

A rated for Wet grip should translate into decent grip

Every wet grip a-rated tyre I've driven on has been decent in the wet
SteveH
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:15 pm
Location: Ireland!

Re: tyres

Post by SteveH »

I had my eye on the newer Hankook K120 Evo2 tyre.

Previous incarnations of the tyre have been very positive, and this seems to be trending the same way. I've always been a fan of Hankook, and the price is definitely appealing.
RikH77
Posts: 1407
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:39 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: tyres

Post by RikH77 »

Hankook's are great tyres for the price, im going for more when my current Falkens are done
stuMR2lee
Posts: 506
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:47 pm
Location: Colchester, Essex

Re: tyres

Post by stuMR2lee »

16" tyre availability in MR2 sizes is very limited. It was a choice for me of Kumho KU31 in 205/45 & 225/45 or Rainsport 3 in 205/50 & 225/50.

I went for the Rainsport 3's in the end. Grip seems fine although not tested them out in the rain or on a spirited drive yet as still scrubbing them in.

Obviously you need to be aware of potential rubbing and fitment if going for a slightly higher profile than stock. My offset is 35 and I don't have any issues with this size tyre.

Certainly fill the arches up nicely with the 30mm lowering springs :lol: .
SonicSW20
Posts: 3681
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 7:54 pm

Re: tyres

Post by SonicSW20 »

I have KU31's all round on mine.

They are decent for the price.

Not quite as grippy in the dry as the T1R's that were on there before, but they do seem to perform better in the wet.

Plenty enough grip to have confidence on a B road blast, which is what matters for me!
fingers99
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 11:31 pm
Location: Liverpool

Re: tyres

Post by fingers99 »

My experience with Rainsports is limited to smaller, slower cars than the MR2, but I loved them.

They do wear pretty quickly, some folk hate the relatively soft sidewalls (although that tends to make them better on lowered, firmly damped cars), but for grip, wet and dry, they were outstanding.
simpson_eh
Posts: 633
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:27 pm
Location: south wales

Re: tyres

Post by simpson_eh »

whats the difference between these two apart from the price ? and why the difference in price

http://www.camskill.co.uk/m62b2829s300p ... _205_50R16
stuMR2lee
Posts: 506
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:47 pm
Location: Colchester, Essex

Re: tyres

Post by stuMR2lee »

Speed rating. I went for the Y's.
SonicSW20
Posts: 3681
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 7:54 pm

Re: tyres

Post by SonicSW20 »

simpson_eh wrote:whats the difference between these two apart from the price ? and why the difference in price

http://www.camskill.co.uk/m62b2829s300p ... _205_50R16


Different speed rating.

Cheaper one is V. Other one is Y. V is up to 149MPH, Y is up to 186MPH.
simpson_eh
Posts: 633
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:27 pm
Location: south wales

Re: tyres

Post by simpson_eh »

yeah just seen that :( lol
SonicSW20
Posts: 3681
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 7:54 pm

Re: tyres

Post by SonicSW20 »

V will be fine for an MR2. No harm in getting the Y rated ones, I guess they'll be a bit tougher to be able to handle a higher maximum speed?
stuMR2lee
Posts: 506
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:47 pm
Location: Colchester, Essex

Re: tyres

Post by stuMR2lee »

I think V was the minimum for a MK2. RS3 Rears only available in a Y for the 225/50 so I just kept the same.

Image

Image
acf8181
Posts: 809
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Norwich

Re: tyres

Post by acf8181 »

Rainsports are my tyre of choice (2's are amazing, 3's even better!)

Sadly can't get them in the o.e. mr2 mk2 rear size :-(
simpson_eh
Posts: 633
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:27 pm
Location: south wales

Re: tyres

Post by simpson_eh »

went for rainsport 3 all round 205/50 front 225/50 rears £300 delivered
stuMR2lee
Posts: 506
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:47 pm
Location: Colchester, Essex

Re: tyres

Post by stuMR2lee »

They do get very good reviews. Looking at your garage seems you have the same wheels as me, Enkei RP01. Should be fine.
fingers99
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 11:31 pm
Location: Liverpool

Re: tyres

Post by fingers99 »

acf8181 wrote:Rainsports are my tyre of choice (2's are amazing, 3's even better!)

Sadly can't get them in the o.e. mr2 mk2 rear size :-(


I wonder -- if we wrote them a nice letter? :wink:
acf8181
Posts: 809
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Norwich

Re: tyres

Post by acf8181 »

fingers99 wrote:
acf8181 wrote:Rainsports are my tyre of choice (2's are amazing, 3's even better!)

Sadly can't get them in the o.e. mr2 mk2 rear size :-(


I wonder -- if we wrote them a nice letter? :wink:


i don't think there is eough mr2 owners in the world to convince them sadly
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”