the WORST modification thread

Discussion and technical advice for 84-89 AW10 & AW11 MR2. 3A-LU, 4A-GE, 4A-GZE.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

010on1986
Posts: 586
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:17 pm
Location: UK

the WORST modification thread

Post by 010on1986 »

heres my entry

Image

what were they thinking,
Ry_B
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:57 pm

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by Ry_B »

cold air :wink:
waynestoyotamr2
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:25 pm
Location: Northwich, Cheshire
Contact:

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by waynestoyotamr2 »

LOL!!!! :shock: :lol: [-X
greglebon
Posts: 757
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:52 am
Location: Worthing, UK

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by greglebon »

It looks horrendous, granted..!

But if you look, the filter is actually in some sort of shrouding OUTSIDE the engine cover, so it will (probably) be getting a good supply of cold air.....?

Better in principle than bolting a JR to the TB...... :wink:

I'd like to see a pic with the engine cover closed.. :?
kevin..in
Posts: 3412
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:26 am
Location: stoke on trent

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by kevin..in »

greglebon wrote:It looks horrendous, granted..!

But if you look, the filter is actually in some sort of shrouding OUTSIDE the engine cover, so it will (probably) be getting a good supply of cold air.....?

Better in principle than bolting a JR to the TB...... :wink:

I'd like to see a pic with the engine cover closed.. :?

above the engine cover is a bit of a dead zone airflow wise though so it might actually be starving the filtre of air :?
monkeymax
Posts: 4595
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 12:41 am
Location: Portsmouth

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by monkeymax »

Actually it looks as though he's only cut into the lower skin of the engine bay cover, and it isn't actually a hole going though. It's just given enough space to accommodate the filter in the engine bay, but the filter doesn't extend out of the bay. So it will not be getting outside air - from what I can tell from that picture.
And even if it did - he's cut extra holes at the front of the engine bay panel (with some meshing on them). If the filter did extend to the outside again, he probably would be getting a feed of air to it due to these cut outs, but some of it will be the warm air from the engine...
greglebon
Posts: 757
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:52 am
Location: Worthing, UK

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by greglebon »

Interesting arrangement......

Looking a bit closer, it looks like the top of the filter is not really protruding much above the level of the engine cover, anyway..? :?

Maybe half in/ half-out?

Now the guy's either a bodger.....or he's done some tests...... :wink:

I'm siding with the former.....but as I said, a pic of it with the engine cover closed will wrap it up....... :D
MartG
Posts: 6029
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:19 pm
Location: Poulton le Fylde, Blackpool
Contact:

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by MartG »

monkeymax wrote:Actually it looks as though he's only cut into the lower skin of the engine bay cover, and it isn't actually a hole going though.


Nope - you can see through the hole to the reflection in the rear window.

My vote is for him being a bodger - never mind the warm air from the engine bay being drawn in, when the car is moving the area behind the rear window is in a low pressure area, exactly the opposite of what you want for the engine air intake.
Swiss Toni
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Lincs

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by Swiss Toni »

I think this answers it...

Image

#-o
LimeyMk1
IMOC Committee
Posts: 11200
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:28 am
Location: Gosport

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by LimeyMk1 »

MartG wrote:[My vote is for him being a bodger - never mind the warm air from the engine bay being drawn in, when the car is moving the area behind the rear window is in a low pressure area, exactly the opposite of what you want for the engine air intake.


I don't think that would be the case in this instance. :-k The restrictions to flow from the engine bay and under the car to the 'dead space' have been significantly reduced, so I reckon there would be far more equalisation of pressure accross the engine lid. (IYSWIM)

Anyhoo my nomination for worst mod has to be the electric supercharger or ebay resistor. :mrgreen:
parody

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by parody »

That mod looks almost as good as the one my mate did to his Nova SR about nine years ago - how does a Webber carb glued onto the bonnet sound to you?? Bet he got maximum airflow there... :clap: :lol:
greglebon
Posts: 757
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:52 am
Location: Worthing, UK

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by greglebon »

parody wrote:a Webber carb glued


:roll: :shock:

....no xxxx?? GLUED???
Tom G
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 12:48 pm
Location: Bishops Stortford, Herts

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by Tom G »

parody wrote:That mod looks almost as good as the one my mate did to his Nova SR about nine years ago - how does a Webber carb glued onto the bonnet sound to you?? Bet he got maximum airflow there... :clap: :lol:


Hehe, that was a classic nova mistake, putting on a weber carb and trying to close the bonnet... and making an air-filter shape in it :lol:
I don;t think you mean glued literally... just very close? I had the same set up in mine, and it was very quick (well comparable to an aw11 due to being much lighter)
I think the whole cold air feed obsession is misguided... it makes a very minor difference but not worth cutting holes or removing headlamps!

PS I use the std mk1 ducting intake in my mk1.5, with no problems!

1987 Mk1.5, CT20b, LSD, Chargecooled, 260...290bhp (est)
2003 330ci M-sport
1995 Polo 1.3CL
phaeton
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:46 pm
Location: Worksop Notts

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by phaeton »

010on1986 wrote:heres my entry ,

Sleepy eye kit has got to be the worst modification EVER to either a MK1 or MK2.

Alan...
triplecustard
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: LINCS / NORFOLK BORDER

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by triplecustard »

isnt standard mk1b intake better than any aftermarket system?
It looks to me like it has a ram air effect from pick-up in side scoop.

I agree about sleepy eyes, they always look like headlamps are broken. :lol:
galea360

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by galea360 »

i bet on a dry day thats not a bad mod the air outside the engine bay has GOT to be colder, BUT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN IT RAINS (Everyday in england)
Sharpfish
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 6:29 am

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by Sharpfish »

phaeton wrote:
010on1986 wrote:heres my entry ,

Sleepy eye kit has got to be the worst modification EVER to either a MK1 or MK2.

Alan...



:clap: :clap: :clap:
kevin..in
Posts: 3412
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:26 am
Location: stoke on trent

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by kevin..in »

010on1986 wrote:heres my entry

Image

what were they thinking,


there are worse things you can do!!! :shock:

Image
greglebon
Posts: 757
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:52 am
Location: Worthing, UK

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by greglebon »

Now, thats going to be far better than the white one....... :D

Same principle...but just done properly.........
At least it has a fair sized intake, and will actually feed air to the engine bay / intake (whatever)......

I did however see a similar sort of thing: I think it was on a white Mk1.....where the intake resembled the Loch Ness monster in the old pix.......!

I cant find the pic of the car, but this is the LNM pic to which I refer:

http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgur ... %26hl%3Den

Sorry about link length...... :D
WeirdNeville
Posts: 425
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 4:10 pm

Re: the WORST modification thread

Post by WeirdNeville »

Using the resources at my disposal, here are my entries to this thread:

Please note! Click on pics to see more of each car, but I CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTENT! I would not advise browsing at work for example!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

That'll do for now....
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK1 1984-1989 NA & SC”