One more!

Discussion and technical advice for 84-89 AW10 & AW11 MR2. 3A-LU, 4A-GE, 4A-GZE.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

craig
Posts: 43936
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 3:44 am

Re: One more!

Post by craig »

PW@Woodsport wrote:LOL Peroni is my second fav drink, also try Palm beer, you need to import that from Holland, i get a case of it every few months, but remember to convert it to pints before it enters the UK :lol:


nice one :thumleft:

PW@Woodsport wrote:LOL Peroni is my second fav drink, also try Palm beer, you need to import that from Holland, i get a case of it every few months, but remember to convert it to pints before it enters the UK :lol:


Noted! :clap: :lol:
stenky
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Slovakia

Re: One more!

Post by stenky »

you are just being ridiculous with the imperial measurements now.

it is sooo convenient to fill up a transmission when toyota says litres and redline sells oils in U.S. quarts.

I am going to develop my own silly system. Main unit will be one "banana", which equals to 180.31451452mm. Now lets call 7,25 bananas an "arrow". and there you have it, a imperial system :D just so convenient ;)
oh, and let's have different bananas, american bananas will be longer, because america is better
Image
PW@Woodsport
Posts: 7642
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: durham
Contact:

Re: One more!

Post by PW@Woodsport »

LOL that actually works, my banana is exactly 180.31451452mm :thumleft:
Image
stenky
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Slovakia

Re: One more!

Post by stenky »

mine too, coincidence? :D i feared calling it a sausage :D
Image
craig
Posts: 43936
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 3:44 am

Re: One more!

Post by craig »

stenky wrote:mine too, coincidence? :D i feared calling it a sausage :D


My sausage is an "arrow" long 8-[ :lol:
synXero
Posts: 3781
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: London, Edinburgh, or the Highlands!

Re: One more!

Post by synXero »

Since you're all being ridiculous.

Lets measure fuel in mpg. Distance per volume.

Or maybe gallons per mile? Volume per distance.

That's L^3 / L.

Therefore we could measure our fuel usage in L^2.

Yeah xxxx it lets use meters squared for fuel consumption. It's easy when you've worked it out.
BMR2L
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:58 pm
Location: Argyll and Bute, Scotland

Re: One more!

Post by BMR2L »

Wow, hornets nest!

I didn't know the MOT allowed kph or mph, was assuming it was only miles.

My understanding is that imports over 10 years old only need to pass an MOT and then you can potter down to the DVLA to register it. Imports under that need an IVA and that specifies a speedo that can show mph so I had to change the overlay on my Mitsubishi. One of the steps at the VOSA centre is to test the speedo for accuracy and thats done in mph. The odo still reads in km obviously but to my surprise the mileage (km-age?) stated on the MOT certificate actually has km as units.

So sounds like I _could_ just keep the kph speedo in the SC and I probably will for the expediency of getting it registered. But personally I don't like the JDM speedos that much, just not enough numbers and too much empty space.

Standards -- so many to choose from.

-Alan
Ben
Posts: 3074
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: Oxford(ish)
Contact:

Re: One more!

Post by Ben »

My '96 Trueno had a speedo in KMs, had no problems with it at all. My current Mk1 SC had the original JDM clocks until a couple of years ago, when they were swapped to a USDM SC MPH set - this was in Northern Ireland though, so not sure if that has any bearing.

Curiously, there's still a KM/h - MPH conversion sticker on the dash :lol:
2001 BMW M5 (Bahnstormer) | 2004 RX8 231 (the Racecat) | 2001 Volvo V70 (Swedish eBay barge)

Previous:
1989 MR2 Mk1b T-bar | 1988 MR2 SC Super Edition
PW@Woodsport
Posts: 7642
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: durham
Contact:

Re: One more!

Post by PW@Woodsport »

Bananas per hour...... it's the future.
Image
stenky
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Slovakia

Re: One more!

Post by stenky »

Hours are too consistent time measurement Paul. It's time to come up with some more random units. It puzzles me that imperials didn't pioneer this area of endless fun :-D
Image
jimi
Posts: 2139
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:27 am
Location: Kingdom of Fife
Contact:

Re: One more!

Post by jimi »

All this "metric is better" "easier to use" "easier to break down units" "The UK went metric" etc, etc, etc.
I assume that time measurement is metric ? minutes, hours, days, months, years ???
Image
MartG
Posts: 6029
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:19 pm
Location: Poulton le Fylde, Blackpool
Contact:

Re: One more!

Post by MartG »

PW@Woodsport wrote:Bananas per hour...... it's the future.


Furlongs per fortnight has a nice ring to it, don't you think ? :clown:
Kateg28
Posts: 305
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:13 pm
Location: Hertford

Re: One more!

Post by Kateg28 »

If you want to really confuse the MOT, try my speedo (on an imported SC):

Image

Sorry for the area in white from the flash.

But you look at it and it all looks fine. But look closer and start working out the incremements in MPH and then try it in KPH.
Has passed two UK MOT's so far but I admit I use the SatNav as I give up on the speedo.

And never had a speeding ticket, ever. 8)
So far. :pray:

By the way, in respect of importing, I imported from Eire so still outside the UK. All I needed was an MOT and then the documents, no VOSA inspection.

Oh, and a floor. Turned out I didn't have one :shock: and the MOT required one. #-o
Ben
Posts: 3074
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: Oxford(ish)
Contact:

Re: One more!

Post by Ben »

Bloody hell Kate! :shock:

Is that an overlay? As I have both JDM km/h and USDM mph clocks,and neither of them are that messy... :S

No wonder you use the satnav :lol:
2001 BMW M5 (Bahnstormer) | 2004 RX8 231 (the Racecat) | 2001 Volvo V70 (Swedish eBay barge)

Previous:
1989 MR2 Mk1b T-bar | 1988 MR2 SC Super Edition
Kateg28
Posts: 305
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:13 pm
Location: Hertford

Re: One more!

Post by Kateg28 »

I am hoping to rely on the following exchange:

Officer: So, Madam, how fast do you think you were going?
Kate: Not a clue, but doesn't she look gorgeous?
Officer: Good point, on your way.
MartG
Posts: 6029
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:19 pm
Location: Poulton le Fylde, Blackpool
Contact:

Re: One more!

Post by MartG »

The top speedo is the one that came with my JDM import SC, with crappy paper stick on overlay. The one in the panel below is a UK spec one I transplanted

Image

Also note the different tacho redline between the SC one and the NA one behind.
0233winch
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:27 am

Re: One more!

Post by 0233winch »

Absolute stunner! Wish mine was that nice. Whats the miles per gallon like on a SC version?
MartG
Posts: 6029
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:19 pm
Location: Poulton le Fylde, Blackpool
Contact:

Re: One more!

Post by MartG »

Most I ever got out of a tank was about 350 miles ( same size tank as NA ) driving like a granny, and the least was 65 miles on a trackday at Trac Mon 8) . Averaged about 250 miles/tank in normal driving
0233winch
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:27 am

Re: One more!

Post by 0233winch »

That's interesting I thought being a SC it would be quite poor on the old mpg but I only get 230 to 280 miles out of mine depending on how I drive and ive just got a normal 1.6.
MartG
Posts: 6029
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:19 pm
Location: Poulton le Fylde, Blackpool
Contact:

Re: One more!

Post by MartG »

Remember the SC is clutched, and only engages when the engine is under heavy load i.e. when accelerating or at high speed
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK1 1984-1989 NA & SC”