Turbo or na

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

HighwayStar
Posts: 4273
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: in front
Contact:

Re: Turbo or na

Post by HighwayStar »

I'd dispute that fella. Not a lot of point in power if it's just a daily driver doing the work commute or shopping. I've run my n/a as a daily driver for 14.5years and it's not because I'm afraid of more power. It's because the n/a 2 is still a great chassis and huge fun to drive, pretty reliable, good looking and relatively cheap to run.... If you get your fun in the corners rather than the straights it's equally effective... some argue more so especially in poor conditions.

R.
Odin_S
Posts: 1210
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 3:35 am
Location: London

Re: Turbo or na

Post by Odin_S »

Why not have both? Speaking as I've owed an NA. A turbo can be driven like a NA.
Just all the hassle of trying to sell your na after you've maybe got attached to it a little like the chassis but want more performance.

Seen it so many times on here over the years, very rarely seen someone go from turbo to na
HighwayStar
Posts: 4273
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: in front
Contact:

Re: Turbo or na

Post by HighwayStar »

Well plenty of opinions and advice here now OP. Have you got any contenders earmarked yet? Any decisions made yet?

R
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”