
It's not about being quicker, it's about crossing the line before our unreliable engines blow up

Not really,that's just being a bit silly isn't it? I would however say that it's more about being able to drive the same car 5 years afterwards without having to rebuild the engine.

I have absolutely no problem with folk trying to get the best from their 4age's,its a fantastic engine,what i do have a problem with is the way people make it sound very easy,for hardly any money and they end up with a rock solid 200+ bhp.

.

.

.

it's absolute nonsense.

The figures speak for themselves,25 years of production,unlimited resources and some very clever people building them,yet we have seen less than what? 3 turbo 4age's in the whole country in 25 years? Out of those how many ran for any significant time?If they are so cheap and easy to build why aren't we building them? I mean my business is Mr2 engines/conversions,so surely i should be the busiest man in the country churning out 4a-gte's?

Sorry folks but the truth of the matter is,wether you like it or not,is that they are very costly to build properly versus a relatively drop in powerplant that will produce 250+ bhp for the rest of the cars life.

Don't get me wrong,i'd take the mk1 in this thread in a heartbeat,but it really is time to take off the 4agte tinted glasses,or at least be real about it's build costs and attainability.

Having said all of that i'd love to have a crack at building one myself,maybe i will? but i'd set myself a budget of at least

£4k before even starting.
