

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Marf wrote:Naughty Rob, thats a bad Rob!Image Replaced With URL For Quote
![]()
http://www.jonrb.com/emoticons/gonnagetit.gif
allan welsh wrote:It isn't obviously legal then is it and you are breaking forum rules by posting such activities.However I can imagine because you've been around since the year dot you'll be allowed to get away with it as no one wants to upset the establishment esp since you are one of the best drivers in the world with ultimate car control.
Which is why you crashed into a lamp post
- not enough radar range there eh?
Just because a magazine does it does it make it ok? No it doesn't and to use that as an arguement is just pathetic and shows you know you're in the wrong.Tell you what, why not exceed the limits of grip while the cops are around, why not drift round a roundabout while they are watching.
The very fact you have posted saying you don't do this when they're around means you know you will get busted for it.
So that's really the end of your arguement.
matt_mr2t wrote:
You've missed the point chaps.People get told off for saying they have broken the speed limit as it's against forum rules.
But Lauren, the very person telling people off quite happily tells regularly how she treats public roads like a race track.
You cant have 1 rule for one and another for another.
If you cant say you broke the speed limit, you shouldnt be able to say you got your car sideways either.
Of course every member has overcooked it on the road, we're all car enthusiasts who own(or have owned) sports cars that get driven as such.
Lauren wrote:matt_mr2t wrote:
You've missed the point chaps.People get told off for saying they have broken the speed limit as it's against forum rules.
But Lauren, the very person telling people off quite happily tells regularly how she treats public roads like a race track.
You cant have 1 rule for one and another for another.
If you cant say you broke the speed limit, you shouldnt be able to say you got your car sideways either.
Of course every member has overcooked it on the road, we're all car enthusiasts who own(or have owned) sports cars that get driven as such.
It is your inference that I treat roads as a race track.Your inference may not be correct.
![]()
I don't go on about breaking the speed limit because that is obviously illegal.But it's not illegal to have yoiur car sideways is it? The difference is I don't overcook it.
Lauren wrote:It is your inference that I treat roads as a race track.Your inference may not be correct.
![]()
I don't go on about breaking the speed limit because that is obviously illegal.But it's not illegal to have yoiur car sideways is it? The difference is I don't overcook it.
Geoff Munt wrote:Lauren,
Have you ever heard the phrase"when you're in a hole, stop digging"?
You freely admit to having accrued 25 points on your licence, having crashed into a lampost and if memory serves correctly, being involved in an RTA where someone was killed.
Can you not accept that this might just cast some doubt over your'miraculous' powers of observation and driving skills?
![]()
Geoff Munt wrote:Lauren,
Have you ever heard the phrase"when you're in a hole, stop digging"?
You freely admit to having accrued 25 points on your licence, having crashed into a lampost and if memory serves correctly, being involved in an RTA where someone was killed.
Can you not accept that this might just cast some doubt over your'miraculous' powers of observation and driving skills?
![]()
Dale_V wrote:Geoff Munt wrote:Lauren,
Have you ever heard the phrase"when you're in a hole, stop digging"?
You freely admit to having accrued 25 points on your licence, having crashed into a lampost and if memory serves correctly, being involved in an RTA where someone was killed.
Can you not accept that this might just cast some doubt over your'miraculous' powers of observation and driving skills?
![]()
any more info on this, news article etc? sounds an interesting read
allan welsh wrote:lauren, I don't buy or read evo so I don't pay for those arses to get it sideways.Sadly however I help pay for the bandwidth you use to spout poo on this forum.
That I object too.
Lauren wrote:It is your inference that I treat roads as a race track.Your inference may not be correct.
![]()
I don't go on about breaking the speed limit because that is obviously illegal.But it's not illegal to have yoiur car sideways is it? The difference is I don't overcook it.
poo woman, it IS illegal to have your car sideways on the public highway as it's driving without due care and attention.It's not in the xxxxxx highway code either I'd love you to say to the coppers, well yeah but I do it sideways on the track all the time so I'm fully in control!
As for the lamp post, obviously you couldn't stop in the distance you could see hence your no choice option, but since you've had 25 speeding points that's a given then eh?
RobCrezz wrote:allan welsh wrote:lauren, I don't buy or read evo so I don't pay for those arses to get it sideways.Sadly however I help pay for the bandwidth you use to spout poo on this forum.
That I object too.
Lauren wrote:It is your inference that I treat roads as a race track.Your inference may not be correct.
![]()
I don't go on about breaking the speed limit because that is obviously illegal.But it's not illegal to have yoiur car sideways is it? The difference is I don't overcook it.
poo woman, it IS illegal to have your car sideways on the public highway as it's driving without due care and attention.It's not in the xxxxxx highway code either I'd love you to say to the coppers, well yeah but I do it sideways on the track all the time so I'm fully in control!
As for the lamp post, obviously you couldn't stop in the distance you could see hence your no choice option, but since you've had 25 speeding points that's a given then eh?
Would you vote"yes" for more speed cameras and lower speed limits?
allan welsh wrote:RobCrezz wrote:allan welsh wrote:lauren, I don't buy or read evo so I don't pay for those arses to get it sideways.Sadly however I help pay for the bandwidth you use to spout poo on this forum.
That I object too.
poo woman, it IS illegal to have your car sideways on the public highway as it's driving without due care and attention.It's not in the xxxxxx highway code either I'd love you to say to the coppers, well yeah but I do it sideways on the track all the time so I'm fully in control!
As for the lamp post, obviously you couldn't stop in the distance you could see hence your no choice option, but since you've had 25 speeding points that's a given then eh?
Would you vote"yes" for more speed cameras and lower speed limits?
lower speed limits in town yeah i can see that but I'd have more coppers on the road.Just because you are driving under the speed limit doesn't mean you are safe
Quigonjay wrote:30 IS too fast in certain situations, housing estates for instance where children tend to play, thats why we now have 20 limits on some of them
i just tend to use speed limits as a guide line, there is a time and place, drive according to the conditions(weather, road surface, area etc) just common sense really
tonigmr2 wrote:As for the rest, you guys are funny, doesn't take much to wind people up I see, same as always!
mr2nut123 wrote:Lauren tells people off for driving their car fast/sideways/anyway the government don't like it, then she does it herself.