![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
One net gain is significantly reduced lag but what are the potentially downsides?
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Just tossing ideas around of course
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Magic Beans wrote:What would be required?
Magic Beans wrote:One net gain is significantly reduced lag but what are the potentially downsides?
jimGTS wrote:been done over on the uk OC by Olly very recently.
pistol pete wrote:Toni's been doing one on the mk1 for 1 or 2 years now(ohh it might be a touch longer than that now
![]()
![]()
) only playing toni
i think you will find it costs lots and is a large pain in the rear end..
Magic Beans wrote:Spectacular effort there![]()
Although it looks like an epic job to do
![]()
![]()
448@ 2.5k is mental from an MR2
![]()
![]()
I'd love to see some videos of it in action.
Kongaroo wrote:Did Toni's twincharger get finished? I seem to recall reading her post about it being nearly complete quite a while ago?
Rogue wrote:"Finished" is such a definitive term.
![]()
![]()
![]()
It's been run up on a dyno a couple of times now.The last session showed up some improvements that we could make to manage the airflow between the turbocharger and supercharger which have now been done.
The next step is to take it back to the dyno but that's not going to happen until the snow is long gone!
Depending upon your goals, the level of technology already present in your car and your hardware preferences I think you could achieve twincharging quite cost effectively.