![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
301BHP i believe, however will be on the heavy side.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Anyone any stories to tell?.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
willfinch36 wrote:Yes I have seen one in my rear view mirror off the lights, and im only running about 285bhp..
.
.
Rob B wrote:They look the part imo but why the front wheel drive![]()
a guy I know was after one but seems to think that alot of examples have been down on power quoted when put on a dyno(As evo showed)
should be ok against other hot hatches but not against an mr2 turbo
willfinch36 wrote:To be fair they look like a new focus with a bodykit from halfords..
.
well not far off anyway!
Lauren wrote:Rob B wrote:They look the part imo but why the front wheel drive![]()
a guy I know was after one but seems to think that alot of examples have been down on power quoted when put on a dyno(As evo showed)
should be ok against other hot hatches but not against an mr2 turbo
I hear the chassis is rather good though, so could be a match for a turbo on that score.![]()
Nowt wrong with FWD.A good chassis, is a good chassis.
![]()
ekona wrote:I wouldn't even say the MR2 is faster.Maybe in a 0-60 dash due to the weight placement, but on a country road dash I'd hazard a guess that the Toyota wouldn't see which way the Ford went.
Chassis development has moved on a fair bit since the mk2 was built, as has suspension.
aw11rally wrote:
Yes far too much grip these days.I'd much rather have an LSD out back and more power than grip.