Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
luthor1 wrote:It did a 1:08.23, which puts it in 106th position, not 125th?
They've mis printed it! ROFL!
- I didn't expect the tubby to be in a higher position than the more powerful 280BHP 1998 22B STI and Evo IV. Nice find jay. 
whitetrash wrote:Kongaroo wrote:The Honda Integra type R verses Tubby debate of course
HA!
DC2 Hands Down
'handling', poor throttle response and that they'd rather drive something newer and unmodified 
It is faster than lots of cars including the new golf gti.luthor1 wrote:It did a 1:08.23, which puts it in 106th position, not 125th?
They've mis printed it! ROFL!
.. happy to see they changed it so fast! A few seconds of time and you're happy, I'm happy... everybody's happy 
The TVIS Kid wrote:What is even more impressive is where the n/a mr2 comes in.
It appears to be the lap time for a rev 1 tubby from another best motoring video. - and true MR2 geekiness - I watched most of the best motoring You Tube vids of the SW20 at Tsubaka 'JDM old cars': Rev 2 turbo GTS - 1.08.23'Classic battle': Rev3 turbo GTS - 1.08.75'Old school 90's 2L': Rev 1/2? turbo - 1.09.23 'Mazda roadster': Rev 5 beams? - 1.09.57'<3.5M Yen': Rev 5 turbo GT - 1.09.76'JDM old cars': Rev 1 turbo GT - 1.10.43'FTO GPX vs': MR2 N/A 3SGE rev 3 - 1.11.89 - 1.12.2