![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
JJ wrote:and for the lazy.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
CONE KILLER!!
michael wrote:What's the setup with them these days? Do they employ local photographers to go out and take the pics rather than doing it themselves?
Some of the shots are an absolute joke and as Rowland has shown above they seem to pad out the album with shots where your car is hidden behind something else.
Some cars seem to get loads of pics(30+) and others hardly any
- take Neil Johnson as an example here, he was in the pits for most of the day yet still managed more pics than me!
They need to introduce a reduced rate for people who get less than 20 shots IMO-
£2 per picture when 50% of them are the same shot anyway is a bit much but I'll end up buying it for one or two decent ones that I want to get blown up.
michael wrote:
It's not so much a gripe that needs raising with anyone, just a whinge
It's a lottery to be on the track when he's not shifting locations and to be in the shot when he's ready to snap, I just seem to get it wrong.
Some of the shots are an absolute joke and as Rowland has shown above they seem to pad out the album with shots where your car is hidden behind something else.![]()