![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
toxo wrote:Just had mine done again.
Rev3 turbo, fresh head rebuild.Always run on Tesco 99.
CO: 0.36%
HC: 64ppm
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Decatted J?
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
toxo wrote:Just had mine done again.
Rev3 turbo, fresh head rebuild.Always run on Tesco 99.
CO: 0.36%
HC: 64ppm
Marf wrote:toxo wrote:Just had mine done again.
Rev3 turbo, fresh head rebuild.Always run on Tesco 99.
CO: 0.36%
HC: 64ppm
Decatted J?
Gazza_DJ wrote:My NA failed emissions with a decat.
nathan smith wrote:mot garages now use the 13th edition ehaust standards book.if vehicle being tested is not in the book,then tester must use default limits,these are basicaly
not cat limits
(pre 92)eg.mr2 turbos are not in this book
dylan5084 wrote:nathan smith wrote:mot garages now use the 13th edition ehaust standards book.if vehicle being tested is not in the book,then tester must use default limits,these are basicaly
not cat limits
(pre 92)eg.mr2 turbos are not in this book
Just had mine mot'd and this is exactly the case
Peter Gidden - SBITS wrote:dylan5084 wrote:nathan smith wrote:mot garages now use the 13th edition ehaust standards book.if vehicle being tested is not in the book,then tester must use default limits,these are basicaly
not cat limits
(pre 92)eg.mr2 turbos are not in this book
Just had mine mot'd and this is exactly the case
Correct.![]()
A MR2 Turbo with decat in normal, healthy condition will nearly always record a CO of 0.7-1%.
![]()
Anything substantially more e.g.
above 1.3%, and whilst it will pass the MOT, suggests a problem with the engine or management system.
Peter Gidden - SBITS wrote:dylan5084 wrote:do I need another ecu?
Highly unlikely.
Davsurfa wrote:My 94 n/a went in for mot, the tester said because it didn't come with a cat it didn't need one.